Toggle search
Toggle menu
5.1K
5.9K
229
50.6K
VR & AR Wiki
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Virtual Reality

From VR & AR Wiki
More actions
(Redirected from Virtual environment)
Reviewed 13 October 2026. Definitions, tracking and optics, cited human-factors studies, platform roles and legacy support statements, and documented historical events. About review dates.
A person using a virtual reality headset

Virtual Reality (VR) uses computer-mediated sensory displays and interaction to present a virtual environment. In immersive VR, the displayed view responds to the user's movement, allowing the user to look around and act within the represented space. A sense of presence can occur even while the user knows that the environment is artificial.[1][2]

VR is broader than a particular headset. Systems can use a head-mounted display (HMD), a surrounding projection display such as a CAVE, or a desktop display with different interaction and immersion capabilities. The environment can be generated from a simulation, recorded imagery, or a remote scene. These arrangements have different limits on viewpoint movement, interaction and sensory feedback.[3][4][5]

Augmented Reality and Mixed Reality combine digital content with a view of the physical environment. An immersive VR experience instead presents a virtual surrounding scene. A headset can support both modes: the distinction concerns the experience being presented, rather than a permanent division between two kinds of hardware.[6][7]

Main characteristics

Characteristic Meaning and limits
Interactive Input changes the viewpoint or the state of the environment. Looking around, selecting an object and manipulating it are different interactions; a system may support some while limiting others.[8]
Immersive Immersion describes system capabilities, including the movements available for perceiving the scene. In Slater's framework, it differs from the user's subjective response.[1]
Multisensory Visual displays can be combined with spatial audio and haptic feedback. Each channel has its own fidelity and timing limits. A virtual object can be visible without providing the force, texture or temperature of a physical object.[4][9]
Computer-mediated Software maintains or presents the environment and maps input to output. A fully synthetic world is one possibility; recorded or remotely captured scenes are also possible.[4]

Immersion and presence

Slater's 2009 account distinguishes place illusion, the sense of being in the depicted place, from plausibility illusion, the sense that depicted events are happening. Both can occur while the user knows they are artificial. Immersion defines the system's limits; missing feedback or inconsistent responses to movement can interrupt presence.[1]

Presence is assessed indirectly, using questionnaires, behavior and physiological responses. These measures require context: a questionnaire score, task performance and an emotional response are not interchangeable measures, and comparisons across systems with different interaction capabilities need care.[1][10]

Hardware technologies

Head-mounted display

An HMD places visual displays near the eyes. Stereoscopic presentation supplies different perspective images to the two eyes, creating binocular disparity. This is one source of perceived depth, alongside perspective, occlusion and the changes in the view caused by head movement. Stereoscopy alone does not provide a head-tracked virtual environment.[11][5]

Lenses magnify the nearby screen and form a virtual image at a greater optical distance, allowing the eyes to focus on it. The optical system also affects the usable field of view and image distortion. Headsets provide a bounded viewing field rather than necessarily covering the whole range of human vision.[12]

The rendering and tracking system updates the displayed view as the head moves, accounting for orientation and, when available, position.[13]

Latency in the response to motion and display quality affect the experience.[1] Content and user behavior also matter when evaluating a VR system.[10]

Motion tracking

Tracking estimates the motion of the headset, controllers or body parts. The distinction between rotation and translation is commonly expressed as degrees of freedom:[14]

Tracking capability What is measured Consequence for the view
Three degrees of freedom (3DoF) Rotation about three axes, conventionally described as yaw, pitch and roll Turning the head changes viewing direction. Translation is not directly tracked, although software may estimate limited movement from a body model.[14]
Six degrees of freedom (6DoF) Rotation plus translation along three spatial axes Leaning, crouching or moving sideways can change viewpoint position as well as direction, within the tracking system's usable space.[14]

Inertial sensors provide rapid motion measurements. Gyroscopes measure angular velocity, while accelerometers and other observations can help correct orientation estimates. Sensor fusion combines measurements to constrain errors; simply integrating inertial measurements does not provide indefinitely accurate position. Optical and other tracking methods provide additional observations or references.[13]

Head tracking and body tracking have different roles. The former supplies the viewpoint used to render the environment; tracked hands or controllers can supply input for selection and manipulation. The tracking range, visibility requirements and available input devices vary by system. Detailed methods are covered in Comparison of tracking systems.[13][8]

Further reading: hand and finger tracking, foot tracking, and body tracking category.

Input devices and locomotion

Input devices include gamepads, mouse and keyboard, motion controllers, and sensors for hand tracking or eye tracking. Applications map input to actions. A visual hand representation alone does not provide physical contact.[8][9]

Locomotion maps physical movement to virtual movement. Room-scale VR uses tracked movement within a physical area. Larger virtual spaces may require controller-driven travel, discrete jumps, or other techniques. Moving the viewpoint while the body stays still can create conflicting motion cues. The method affects task performance and comfort.[8][10]

Perception, comfort and accessibility

Depth and focus

A conventional fixed-focus stereoscopic display can ask the eyes to converge toward the depth of a virtual object while focusing at the optical distance of the display. This vergence and accommodation conflict differs from looking at a physical object. Hoffman and colleagues isolated the conflict using a laboratory display with multiple focal planes. Their experiments found effects on binocular fusion, depth perception and visual fatigue.[15]

In their fatigue experiment, 11 observers aged 23-31 with normal stereopsis performed a demanding binocular task during approximately 45-minute sessions. Post-session questionnaires recorded worse eye and head symptoms when vergence and focal cues conflicted than when they agreed. This demonstrates a mechanism under controlled conditions; it does not establish a universal safe exposure time, long-term damage, or the symptoms of every consumer headset.[15]

Cybersickness

Cybersickness can include nausea, dizziness, headache and other discomfort during or after a virtual experience. Susceptibility varies with the person, content, motion and system. Good tracking does not eliminate every possible cause: software can generate apparent self-motion while the body remains stationary.[10]

Fernandes and Feiner tested a dynamic field-of-view restriction during gamepad-controlled travel with seated users wearing an Oculus Rift DK2. Thirty participants aged 20-27 completed two sessions on different days. Six with little discomfort were excluded from the main sickness comparisons. Repeated 0-10 discomfort ratings and measures incorporating time in the environment favored restriction in some comparisons, while first-session post-exposure Simulator Sickness Questionnaire scores did not differ significantly. The experiment supports a particular mitigation approach, not a guarantee that narrowing the view prevents sickness in every application.[16]

Accessibility

Hardware and interaction assumptions can create barriers. Headset fit and weight, setup procedures, the need to hold controllers, large arm movements and visually presented instructions affect users differently. Mott and colleagues' accessibility position paper argues for considering content, interaction, hardware and user representation during design, rather than treating accessibility as a final adjustment.[9]

Original research provides examples of specific adaptations. The SeeingVR study tested customized visual and audio tools with 11 participants with low vision using an HTC Vive. Participants completed menu, visual-search and target-shooting tasks more quickly with the tools; some selection errors were also reduced. Preferences differed, and the study evaluated a prototype with a small group. It does not establish that one set of adaptations makes all VR applications accessible.[17]

The W3C's XR Accessibility User Requirements describes needs such as alternative input mappings, adjustable target presentation, text alternatives for sound, captions and orientation aids. It is a user-needs document rather than a technical conformance standard. Accessibility therefore needs evaluation with the intended users and tasks, including whether essential information and actions remain available through their preferred input and output methods.[2]

Privacy

VR privacy includes the handling of motion data as well as cameras, microphones and account information. Movement used to animate an avatar can also identify its user. Nair and colleagues analyzed public BeatLeader replays from 55,541 Beat Saber players using more than 20 types of VR devices. Their model used head and hand motion together with game-specific context, and identified known players with 94.33% accuracy using 100 seconds of test data after training on about five minutes per player.[18]

That result was obtained across separate sessions within one application and an enrolled candidate pool. It does not show that any person can be identified from arbitrary movement with the same accuracy. It nevertheless demonstrates why removing a username from a motion recording alone does not ensure anonymity.[18]

WebXR also treats spatial tracking as sensitive functionality and defines permission and consent controls around access.[14]

Platforms

A VR ecosystem includes several layers: the device and operating system, the software runtime, application distribution, and the APIs used by developers. An API such as OpenXR is not itself a headset operating system or an app store.[19][7]

Environment or interface Role and scope
Meta Horizon OS and Meta Quest Standalone operating system and device ecosystem supporting fully immersive VR, mixed reality and panel applications. Development paths include engines, OpenXR, WebXR and the Meta Spatial SDK.[7]
SteamVR A PC VR environment for supported headsets and controllers, with a dashboard and access to Steam content. Hardware and operating-system compatibility still depend on the configuration.[20][21]
PlayStation VR and PlayStation VR2 Console VR product families. PS VR2 connects to PS5; a separate PC adapter provides a Steam path. These are distinct configurations rather than one universal software target.[22]
visionOS and Apple Vision Pro A spatial operating system and device ecosystem in which applications can use shared windows and volumes or a dedicated, fully immersive space.[6]
Android XR An XR development platform with headset development paths through engines, OpenXR and WebXR, alongside Android frameworks. Device classes and supported features must be distinguished.[23]
OpenXR A common native API implemented by runtimes from vendors and other projects. It reduces the need for separate API paths while still requiring attention to the selected runtime and available features.[19]
WebXR Browser interfaces for tracked XR devices and input. Applications request a session and test support for the required mode; browser and device support are conditional.[14]

Historical platforms and further navigation

Daydream is no longer supported by Google and receives no further software or security updates. Google warns that its VR app may not work correctly on Android 11 or later. WebVR has been replaced by WebXR; the preserved WebVR specification identifies itself as historical documentation.[24][25]

Windows Mixed Reality was removed in Windows 11 version 24H2. Microsoft states that existing devices can continue to work with Steam through November 2026 if users remain on version 23H2, and that support and updates end after that month. This is a conditional legacy-support statement checked on 13 October 2026.[21]

Further ecosystem articles include Oculus Rift (Platform), Oculus Quest (Platform), OpenVR, OSVR, Pico VR, Vive, HP VR and Windows 10 VR. These links provide subject-specific background; their individual articles should be consulted for dated support and compatibility information.

Additional information

VR Headset Demo Locations provides a separate starting point for demonstrations.

VR Headsets

See also: VR Headsets

For device specifications, see the headset catalog, headset comparison and historical headset list.

Apps

The VR apps directory provides application navigation. Related overviews include Virtual reality game, Cinematic VR, 360 Video and Virtual reality therapy.

Applications and evidence

VR environments can be used for games, multimedia, communication, education and simulation. The purpose of an application determines what should be evaluated: a convincing sense of presence is a different outcome from learning, task accuracy or transfer to a physical task.[2][10]

For example, Makransky, Terkildsen and Mayer compared desktop and Samsung Gear VR versions of a biology laboratory simulation with 52 university students. The counterbalanced experiment measured presence with self-report scales and learning with pre- and post-tests. The headset condition produced higher reported presence but lower knowledge gains. Differences in transfer-test gains were not statistically significant. The authors identified limits including the unfamiliar touchpad interface and the particular simulation and sample. This result does not imply that all VR instruction is ineffective; it shows why greater immersion alone cannot establish educational benefit.[26]

Developer resources

Game engines and native interfaces

Unity and Unreal Engine are development paths for immersive applications in the documented Meta and Android XR ecosystems. Native applications can also use OpenXR. Developers need to select the target platform, input methods and supported features, then test the application on the intended hardware.[7][23]

WebXR

WebXR applications query session support and request an immersive session in response to user activation. The immersive-vr mode presents virtual content without integration into the surrounding environment; immersive-ar is defined by the AR module. The older WebVR API remains relevant to the history of web VR development, rather than current browser implementation guidance.[14][25]

Virtual reality history timeline

Figure 1. Stereoscopic images (Image: www.vrs.org.uk)
Figure 2. Link Trainer (Image: www.vrs.org.uk)
Figure 3. Sensorama (Image: www.vrs.org.uk)
Figure 4. NASA virtual environment workstation technology (Image: www.sciencefocus.com)
Figure 5. VR Arcade Machines (Image: www.vrs.org.uk)

The timeline distinguishes optical experiments, fictional devices, patents and interactive computer systems. Dates identify documented publications, patent filings, demonstrations and launches.

1838: Wheatstone's stereoscope

Charles Wheatstone published experiments on binocular vision and described a mirror stereoscope in 1838. The instrument delivered different perspective drawings to the two eyes, which could be perceived as a solid form. His demonstration used outline drawings to isolate the effect from shading and color. It was an optical depth experiment, rather than an interactive computer environment or a demonstration of stereoscopic photography.[11]

1929: Link Trainer

Edwin A. Link developed the Link Trainer as a mechanical approach to teaching basic piloting. Its cockpit controls operated pneumatic bellows, allowing the trainer to pitch, bank and turn. It became an instrument-training system; ASME's engineering-history account reports that Link trainers were used by more than 500,000 pilots during World War II. This flight simulation history concerns physical simulation rather than computer-generated headset imagery.[27]

1935: Pygmalion's Spectacles

Stanley G. Weinbaum's Pygmalion's Spectacles first appeared in Wonder Stories in June 1935. Its fictional spectacles present an experience with sight, sound, smell, taste, touch and participation in the story. The text illustrates an imagined multisensory experience; it is not evidence that such a system had been built.[28]

1939-1940: View-Master

Wilhelm B. Gruber filed his stereoscopic viewing-device patent on 20 January 1939; it was granted and published on 6 February 1940. It describes paired transparencies on a rotating disk and lenses for viewing them. The View-Master debuted at the 1939-1940 New York World's Fair, according to Tulane University's collection history, and early reels included national parks, monuments and foreign tourist locations.[29][30]

1957-1962: Heilig's sensory displays

Morton Heilig filed a patent for an individual stereoscopic television apparatus on 24 May 1957, granted on 4 October 1960. The head-worn apparatus included two television tubes, optical units, earphones and air nozzles. Its patent describes a personal sensory display rather than a computer-generated, head-tracked scene.[31]

Heilig's Sensorama simulator patent was filed on 10 January 1961 and granted on 28 August 1962. It describes film imagery coordinated with binaural sound, breezes, odors and vibration or jolts. These effects were coordinated with the film presentation.[32]

1961: Headsight remote viewing

Charles P. Comeau and James S. Bryan described Philco's Headsight system in 1961. A helmet-mounted miniature cathode-ray tube and magnifying mirror optics displayed live video from a remote camera. Magnetic sensing coils measured head orientation, and servomotors aligned the camera's azimuth, nod and tilt with the wearer. The paper describes closed-circuit surveillance rather than computer-generated surroundings.[33]

1965: The Ultimate Display

Ivan Sutherland's The Ultimate Display discussed computer displays that could make mathematical environments perceptible and interactive. Alongside visual output, he considered audio, input devices and computer-controlled kinesthetic feedback. His hypothetical ultimate display was a room in which a computer could control matter, including a chair that could be sat on. This was a proposal about possible displays, not a claim that a working device already reproduced reality indistinguishably.[34]

1968: A head-mounted three dimensional display

Sutherland's 1968 paper reported a system that changed perspective images with the position and orientation of the observer's head. It used miniature cathode-ray tubes and displayed transparent wireframe line drawings. The optics included half-silvered mirrors, allowing the displayed imagery and objects in the room to be seen together. Both mechanical and ultrasonic head-position sensors were described.[35]

The ceiling-supported apparatus became known as the Sword of Damocles.[36] The original paper credits a team including Robert Sproull, who worked on the clipping hardware. The system belongs to both VR and AR history: the reported optical arrangement was see-through rather than a complete replacement of the physical view.[35]

1977: Sayre glove documented

A report dated 10 November 1977 by Thomas A. DeFanti and Daniel J. Sandin describes a glove based on Richard Sayre's idea for sensing hand movement. A light source and a photocell were placed at opposite ends of a flexible tube. Bending or compressing the tube reduced the light reaching the photocell, providing a control signal. The report documents an early data glove used for computer input.[37][38]

1984 onward: NASA virtual environments

NASA Ames developed virtual environment technology from 1984, according to Michael McGreevy's 1991 report. Head-tracked displays could present computer graphics or remotely sensed scenes, while an instrumented glove could support manipulation. The report describes several application areas, including planetary data visualization, computational fluid dynamics, telepresence and space-station telerobotics.[39]

1985: VIDEOPLACE research

Myron Krueger, Thomas Gionfriddo and Katrin Hinrichsen published VIDEOPLACE: an artificial reality in 1985. Their paper describes combining a participant's live video image with a computer graphic world, whose objects respond to the participant's movements in real time. This approach demonstrates that responsive computer environments were explored through video-based interaction as well as wearable displays.[40]

1980s: VPL and virtual reality terminology

Jaron Lanier founded VPL Research in the early 1980s and led work on multiperson virtual worlds using head-mounted displays in the late 1980s. His employer biography associates him with the terms virtual reality and mixed reality, but describes the coining attribution as probable.[41]

1990-1991: Virtuality systems

A contemporaneous account of a W Industries presentation reports that its stand-up unit launched at London's Computer Graphics 90 exhibition in November 1990, followed by a sit-down unit at Wembley in March 1991. The Virtuality systems combined a tracked stereoscopic visor, controls and a host computer. The account describes arcade games and network interaction, preserving the distinction between seated and standing configurations.[42]

1992-1993: CAVE projection VR

Carolina Cruz-Neira, Sandin and DeFanti's CAVE paper states that the system was designed in early 1991, demonstrated to visitors later that year, and premiered at SIGGRAPH 1992. Their 1993 paper explains surrounding projection screens, stereo glasses and tracked viewpoints. The project was motivated by scientific visualization and illustrates a room display approach alongside HMD development.[5]

1993: Sega VR prototype

Sega VR was a proposed headset accessory for the Sega Genesis, publicly presented in 1993 but never commercially released. The Video Game History Foundation's preservation work recovered game source code and examined the original headset drivers, adding evidence about the unfinished system. Its hardware and associated games remained unreleased.[43]

1995: Nintendo Virtual Boy

Nintendo introduced the Virtual Boy in 1995, as recorded in its official history. It is part of the history of stereoscopic gaming. Its inclusion does not make stereoscopic presentation alone equivalent to a modern immersive, head-tracked VR environment.[44][4]

2012-2014: Oculus developer kits and acquisition agreement

The Oculus Rift Kickstarter campaign ran from 1 August to 1 September 2012. Its recorded total is US$2,437,429 from 9,522 backers, against a US$250,000 goal. The campaign concerned a developer kit.[45]

On 25 March 2014, Facebook announced an agreement to acquire Oculus VR for approximately US$2 billion in cash and shares, with an additional conditional earn-out. Subsequent headset and software generations are covered in the headset catalog and platform articles above.[46]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mel Slater (2009). "Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781884/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 "XR Accessibility User Requirements". W3C. 2021. https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  3. ↑ Steven M. LaValle (2020). "Virtual Reality, Chapter 1: Introduction". Steven M. LaValle. https://lavalle.pl/vr/vrch1.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Steven M. LaValle (2020). "Virtual Reality, Chapter 2: Bird's-Eye View". Steven M. LaValle. https://lavalle.pl/vr/vrch2.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Carolina Cruz-Neira; Daniel J. Sandin; Thomas A. DeFanti (1993). "Surround-Screen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE". Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1993. https://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/lok/teaching/dcvef05/papers/cave.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 "visionOS". Apple Developer. https://developer.apple.com/visionos/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 "Quick start guide". Meta Horizon OS Developers. 2026. https://developers.meta.com/vr/essentials/quick-start/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Steven M. LaValle (2020). "Virtual Reality, Chapter 10: Interaction". Steven M. LaValle. https://lavalle.pl/vr/vrch10.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Martez Mott; Edward Cutrell; Mar Gonzalez Franco; Christian Holz; Eyal Ofek; Richard Stoakley; Meredith Ringel Morris (2019). "Accessible by Design: An Opportunity for Virtual Reality". ISMAR 2019 Workshop on Mixed Reality and Accessibility. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2019/08/ismar_mra_workshop_microsoft_final_draft.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Steven M. LaValle (2020). "Virtual Reality, Chapter 12: Evaluating VR Systems and Experiences". Steven M. LaValle. https://lavalle.pl/vr/vrch12.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Charles Wheatstone (1838). "Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. Part the First. On Some Remarkable, and Hitherto Unobserved, Phenomena of Binocular Vision". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. https://www.stereoscopy.com/library/wheatstone-paper1838.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  12. ↑ Steven M. LaValle (2020). "Virtual Reality, Chapter 4: Light and Optics". Steven M. LaValle. https://lavalle.pl/vr/vrch4.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Steven M. LaValle (2020). "Virtual Reality, Chapter 9: Tracking". Steven M. LaValle. https://lavalle.pl/vr/vrch9.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 "WebXR Device API". W3C. 2026. https://www.w3.org/TR/webxr/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 David M. Hoffman; Ahna R. Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S. Banks (2008). "Vergence–accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue". Journal of Vision. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2879326/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  16. ↑ Ajoy S. Fernandes; Steven K. Feiner (2016). "Combating VR Sickness through Subtle Dynamic Field-Of-View Modification". 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. https://www.cs.columbia.edu/2016/combating-vr-sickness/combating-vr-sickness.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  17. ↑ Yuhang Zhao; Edward Cutrell; Christian Holz; Meredith Ringel Morris; Eyal Ofek; Andrew D. Wilson (2019). "SeeingVR: A Set of Tools to Make Virtual Reality More Accessible to People with Low Vision". CHI 2019. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SeeingVRchi2019.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 Vivek Nair; Wenbo Guo; Justus Mattern; Rui Wang; James F. O'Brien; Louis Rosenberg; Dawn Song (2023). "Unique Identification of 50,000+ Virtual Reality Users from Head & Hand Motion Data". 32nd USENIX Security Symposium. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/usenixsecurity23-nair-identification.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Ron Bessems (2024). "Khronos Releases New OpenXR Tutorial". Khronos Group. https://www.khronos.org/blog/khronos-launches-openxr-tutorial. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  20. ↑ Valve. "SteamVR". Steam. https://store.steampowered.com/app/250820/SteamVR/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 "Features and functionality removed in Windows client". Microsoft Learn. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/whats-new/removed-features. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  22. ↑ "PlayStation VR2". PlayStation. https://www.playstation.com/en-us/ps-vr2/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 "Android XR". Android Developers. https://developer.android.com/develop/xr. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  24. ↑ "Daydream service update". Google Daydream Help. https://support.google.com/daydream/answer/7185096?hl=en. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 "WebVR". Immersive Web Community Group. https://immersive-web.github.io/webvr/spec/1.1/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  26. ↑ Guido Makransky; Thomas S. Terkildsen; Richard E. Mayer (2019). "Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning". Learning and Instruction. https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5f8eb6bc5f4fd21c400db907/5fa97946c49e6c72f5f90e38_1-s2.0-S0959475217303274-main.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  27. ↑ Stanley G. Weinbaum (1935). "Pygmalion's Spectacles". Project Gutenberg Australia. https://www.gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0607251h.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  28. ↑ Wilhelm B. Gruber (1940). "Stereoscopic viewing device (US2189285A)". United States patent. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2189285A/en. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  29. ↑ "Viewmasters (1940-Present)". The Latin American Library, Tulane University. https://exhibits.tulane.edu/exhibit/lalstereo/viewmst/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  30. ↑ Morton L. Heilig (1960). "Stereoscopic-television apparatus for individual use (US2955156A)". United States patent. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2955156A/en. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  31. ↑ Morton L. Heilig (1962). "Sensorama simulator (US3050870A)". United States patent. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3050870A/en. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  32. ↑ Charles P. Comeau; James S. Bryan (1961-11-10). "Headsight Television System Provides Remote Surveillance". Electronics, volume 34, issue 45, pages 86-90. https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electronics/60s/61/Electronics-1961-11-10.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  33. ↑ Ivan E. Sutherland (1965). "The Ultimate Display". Proceedings of IFIP Congress. https://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/lok/teaching/dcvef05/papers/ultimate_display.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  34. ↑ 35.0 35.1 Ivan E. Sutherland (1968). "A head-mounted three dimensional display". Proceedings of the AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference. https://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/lok/teaching/dcvef05/papers/sutherland-headmount.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  35. ↑ "Ivan Sutherland’s experimental 3-D display". Computer History Museum. https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/input-output/14/356/1830. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  36. ↑ "Sayre Glove Final Project Report". Electronic Visualization Laboratory. 1977-11-10. https://www.evl.uic.edu/news/1977/1977-11-10-2296/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  37. ↑ Thomas A. DeFanti; Daniel J. Sandin (1977). "Final Report to the National Endowment of the Arts (US NEA R60-34-163)". University of Illinois at Chicago Circle. https://www.evl.uic.edu/documents/us_nea_r60-34-163_sayre_glove_finalreport_november1977.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  38. ↑ Michael W. McGreevy (1991). "The Virtual Environment Display System". NASA Technical Reports Server. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19910013709/downloads/19910013709.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  39. ↑ Myron W. Krueger; Thomas Gionfriddo; Katrin Hinrichsen (1985). "VIDEOPLACE—an artificial reality". CHI 1985. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/317456.317463. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  40. ↑ "Jaron Lanier". Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/people/jalani/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  41. ↑ Chris Hand (1991). "W Industries: A Report from Britain". sci.virtual-worlds (preserved by VRTifacts). https://vrtifacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/vhist.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  42. ↑ Rich Whitehouse (2020). "Sega VR Revived: Emulating an Unreleased Genesis Accessory". Video Game History Foundation. https://gamehistory.org/segavr/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  43. ↑ "Nintendo History". Nintendo. https://www.nintendo.com/en-za/Hardware/Nintendo-History/Nintendo-History-625945.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  44. ↑ "Oculus Rift: Step Into the Game". Kickstarter. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1523379957/oculus-rift-step-into-the-game. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  45. ↑ "Facebook to Acquire Oculus". Meta Newsroom. 2014. https://about.fb.com/news/2014/03/facebook-to-acquire-oculus/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.


Retrieved from "https://vrarwiki.com/index.php?title=Virtual_Reality&oldid=50176"
Contents