Toggle search
Toggle menu
4.7K
5.5K
229
46.3K
VR & AR Wiki
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Positional tracking

From VR & AR Wiki
More actions
See also: Tracking

Positional tracking is a technology that allows a device to know its position relative to the environment around it. It uses a combination of hardware and software to achieve the detection of its absolute position. It is an essential technology for virtual reality (VR), making it possible to track movement with six degrees of freedom (6DOF).[1][2]

Positional tracking is not the same as 3DOF head tracking. 3DOF head tracking only registers the rotation of the head (Rotational tracking), with movements such as pitch, yaw, and roll. Positional tracking registers the exact position and orientation of the headset in space, recognizing forward/backward, up/down and left/right movement [3].

Positional tracking VR technology brings various benefits to the VR experience. It can change the viewpoint of the user to reflect different actions like jumping, ducking, or leaning forward; allow for an exact representation of the user’s hands and other objects in the virtual environment; increase the connection between the physical and virtual world by, for example, using hand position to move virtual objects by touch; and detect gestures by analyzing position over time [2] [4].

It is also known that positional tracking improves the 3D perception of the virtual environment because of parallax (the way objects closer to the eyes move faster than objects farther away). Parallax helps inform the brain about the perception of distance along with stereoscopy [2] [4]. Also, the 6DOF tracking helps reduce drastically motion sickness during the VR experience that is caused due the disconnect between the inputs of what is being seen with the eyes and what is being felt by the ear vestibular system [2] [3].

There are different methods of positional tracking. Choosing which one to apply is dependent on various factors such as the tracking accuracy and the refresh rate required, the tracking area, if the tracking is indoor or outdoor, cost, power consumption, computational power available, whether the tracked object is rigid or flexible, and whether the objects are well known of can change [4].

Positional tracking VR technology is a necessity for VR to work properly since an accurate representation of objects like the head or the hands in the virtual world contribute towards achieving immersion and a greater sense of presence [2] [3] [4] [5].

Methods of positional tracking

1. Markers on a Sensics HMD (Image: www.roadtovr.com)
2. Optical marker by Intersense (Image: www.roadtovr.com)

There are various methods of positional tracking. The description of the methods provided below is based on Boger (2014) [4].

Acoustic Tracking

The measurement of the time it takes for a known acoustic signal to travel between an emitter and a receiver is known as acoustic tracking. Generally, several transmitters are placed in the tracked area and various receivers placed on the tracked objects. The distance between the receiver and transmitter is calculated by the amount of time the acoustic signal takes to reach the receiver. However, for this to work, the system must be aware of when the acoustic signal was sent. The orientation of a rigid object can be known if this object has multiple receivers placed in a known position. The difference between the time of arrival of the acoustic signal to the multiple receivers will provide data about the orientation of the object relative to the transmitters.

One of the downsides of acoustic tracking is that it requires time-consuming calibration to function properly. The acoustic trackers are also susceptible to measurement error due to ambient disturbances such as noise and do not provide high update rates. Due to these disadvantages, acoustic tracking systems are commonly used with other sensors (e.g. inertial sensors) to provide better accuracy.

Intersense, an American technology company, has developed successful acoustic tracking systems.

Wireless tracking

Wireless tracking uses a set of anchors that are placed around the perimeter of the tracking space and one or more tags that are tracked. This system is similar in concept to GPS, but works both indoors and outdoors. Sometimes referred to as indoor GPS. The tags triangulate their 3D position using the anchors placed around the perimeter. A wireless technology called Ultra Wideband has enabled the position tracking to reach a precision of under 100 mm. By using sensor fusion and high speed algorithms, the tracking precision can reach 5 mm level with update speeds of 200 Hz or 5 ms latency. [6] [7] [8]

Inertial tracking

Inertial tracking is made possible by the use of accelerometers and gyroscopes, commonly bundled together in chips called IMUs. Accelerometers measure linear acceleration, which is used to calculate velocity and the position of the object relative to an initial point. This is possible due to the mathematical relationship between position over time and velocity, and velocity and acceleration (4). A gyroscope measures angular velocity. It is a solid-state component based on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology and operates based on the same principles as a mechanical gyro. From the angular velocity data provided by the gyroscope, angular position relative to the initial point is calculated.

This technology is inexpensive and can provide high update rates as well as low latency. On the other side, the calculations (i.e. integration and double-integration) of the values given by the accelerometers (acceleration) and gyroscope (angular velocity) that lead to the object’s position can result in a significant drift in position information - decreasing this method’s accuracy.

Magnetic Tracking

This method measures the magnitude of the magnetic field in different directions. Normally, the system has a base station that generates a magnetic field, with the strength of the field diminishing as distance increases between the measurement point and base station. Furthermore, a magnetic field allows for the determination of orientation. For example, if the measured object is rotated, the distribution of the magnetic field along the various axes is modified.

In a controlled environment, magnetic tracking’s accuracy is good. However, it can be influenced by interference from conductive materials near the emitter of sensors, from other magnetic fields generated by other devices and from ferromagnetic materials in the tracking area. The Razer Hydra motion controllers is an example of implementation of this specific type of positional tracking in a product.

Most Head-mounted displays (HMDs) and smartphones contain IMUs or magnetometers that detect the magnetic field of Earth.

Magnetic tracking can be AC or DC. Magnetic tracking is great because it doesn't need a Kalman filter. It is much higher quality than all other tracking methods, but there are constraints on its usage, like how it cannot be used in environments with a lot of metal due to interference.

Optical Tracking

For optical tracking, there are various methods available. The commonality between them all is the use of cameras to gather positional information.

Tracking with markers

This optical tracking method uses a specific pattern of markers placed on an object (Figure 1). One or more cameras then seek the markers, using algorithms to extract the position of the object from the visible markers. From the difference between what the video camera is detecting and the known marker pattern, an algorithm calculates the position and orientation of the tracked object. The pattern of markers that are placed in the tracked object is not random. The number, location, and arrangement of the markers are carefully chosen in order to provide the system with as much information possible so the algorithms do not have missing data.

There are two types of markers: passive and active. Passive markers reflect infrared light (IR) towards the light source. In this case, the camera provides the IR signal that is reflected from the markers for detection. Active markers are IR lights that flash periodically and are detected by the cameras. Choosing between the two types of markers depends on several variables like distance, type of surface, required viewing direction, and others.

Tracking with visible markers

Visible markers (Figure 2) placed in a predetermined arrangement are also used in optical tracking. The camera detects the markers and their positions leading to the determination of the position and orientation of the object. For example, visible markers can be placed in a specific pattern on the tracking area, and an HMD with cameras would then use this to calculate its position. The shape and size of this type of markers can vary. What is important is that they can be easily identified by the cameras.

Markerless tracking

Objects can be tracked without markers if their geometry is known. With markerless tracking, the system camera searches and compares the received image with the known 3D model for features like edges or color transitions, for example.

Depth map tracking

A depth camera uses various technologies to create a real-time map of the distances of the objects in the tracking area from the camera. The tracking is performed by extracting the object to be tracked (e.g. hang) from the general depth map and analyzing it. An example of a depth map camera is Microsoft’s Kinect.

Sensor Fusion

Sensor fusion is a method of using more than one tracking technique in order to improve the detection of position and orientation of the tracked object. By using a combination of techniques, one method’s disadvantage can be compensated by another. An example of this would be the combination of inertial tracking and optical tracking. The former can develop drift, and the latter is susceptible to markers being hidden (occlusion). By combining both, if markers are occluded, the position can be estimated by the inertial trackers, and even if the optical markers are completely visible, the inertial sensors provide updates at a higher rate, improving the overall positional tracking.

Oculus Rift and HTC Vive’s positional tracking

The Oculus Rift positional tracking is different from the one the HTC Vive uses. While the Oculus Rift uses Constellation, an IR-LED array that is tracked by a camera, the HTC Vive uses Valve’s Lighthouse technology, which is a laser-based system [3].

In the Oculus Rift, movement is limited to the sight area of the camera - when not enough LEDs are in sight of the camera, the software relies on data sent by the headset’s IMU sensors. With Valve’s position tracking system, the tracking area is flooded with non-visible light which the HTC Vive detects using photosensors [3] [9].

Positional tracking and smartphones

Positional tracking in mobile VR still struggles to achieve a good level of accuracy mainly due to the power needed to handle a positional tracking VR system and the fact that using QR codes and cameras for tracking would contradict the essence of having a simple, intuitive, and mobile VR experience (3). Currently, mobile devices are limited by their form factor and can only track the movements of a user’s head. Nevertheless, companies are still investing in the development of an accurate positional tracking system for smartphones. Having this system available to anyone with a phone capable of VR would facilitate the adoption of VR by the general public, possibly unlocking the potential of the VR market [3] [10].

Types of positional tracking

Inside-out tracking - tracking camera is placed on the device (HMD) being tracking.

Outside-in tracking - tracking camera(s) is placed in the external environment where the tracked device (HMD) is within its view.

Markerless tracking - tracking system that does not use fiducial markers.

Markerless inside-out tracking - combines markerless tracking with inside-out tracking

Markerless outside-in tracking - combines markerless tracking with outside-in tracking

Comparison of tracking systems

See also: Comparison of tracking systems

There are several consumer-level tracking systems currently available. Originally, these were used for interaction with regular non-VR video games, but more recent tracking systems have been used for VR systems.

The systems below differ in where the sensors and the reference points sit (outside-in or inside-out), in whether they follow purpose-built markers such as LEDs and photodiodes or natural features of the room, and in how they combine optical measurements with an inertial measurement unit (IMU).[11] Early consumer systems such as the Wii Remote and PlayStation Move were built for console games;[12][13] the Oculus Rift DK2 developer kit added camera-based positional tracking in 2014, and later headsets moved the cameras onto the headset itself.[14][15]

Published accuracy and latency figures for these systems mix manufacturer claims with laboratory measurements made under different conditions, so a number for one system is often not directly comparable with a number for another. Welch and Foxlin point out, for example, that a tracker's update rate contributes to its latency but "doesn't tell the entire story", because the delay also depends on the length of the processing pipeline.[11]

Reviewed 27 September 2026. Checked every figure, quote and citation added in the expansion against the cited papers (Welch and Foxlin 2002, Niehorster et al. 2017, Holzwarth et al. 2021, Banaszczyk et al. 2024, Singh et al. 2025) and the manufacturer and press pages for each tracking system; the IndoTraq 0.3 mm and 10 ms and the WorldSense IMU cells carried over from the earlier page were not confirmed. About review dates.

Comparison table

The table compares the main tracking system of each product. Where a manufacturer figure or an independent measurement is available it is cited in the cell; the section Published accuracy and latency measurements gives the conditions behind the measured values.

Brand & Model Tracking system Inside-out Outside-in Marker-based Marker
light
frequency 		IMU Spatial
resolution
(mm) 		Latency
(ms)
Facebook/Oculus Rift Constellation No Yes[16] Yes Infrared[17] Yes[14] Sub-millimeter (Oculus claim for DK2)[14] ?
IndoTraq HSVT Yes[18] No No None (camera tracking plus an ultra-wideband radio tag)[19] Yes[19] 0.3 10
HTC Vive/SteamVR Lighthouse Yes[20] No Yes Infrared[20] Yes[20] Below 0.2 (RMS jitter, measured)[20] About 22 (end-to-end, measured upper bound)[20]
Microsoft HoloLens Inside-out head tracking (4 environment understanding cameras, 1 depth camera)[21] Yes No No None Yes[21] ? ?
Nintendo Wii Remote Infrared camera in the remote and Sensor Bar[12] Yes No Yes Infrared[22] Yes (3-axis accelerometer)[12] ? ?
Sony PSVR PlayStation Camera[23] No Yes Yes Visible light: blue headset lights;[23] color-changing sphere on PlayStation Move[13] Yes[23] ? Less than 18 (Sony figure for the 2015 prototype)[24]
Google WorldSense Yes[25] No No None Yes ? ?
Oculus Quest / Oculus Rift S Oculus Insight Yes[26] No Controllers only Infrared (controller LEDs)[26] Yes[26] Sub-millimeter (Facebook design target)[26] ?
Windows Mixed Reality Inside-out tracking by headset cameras[27] Yes No Controllers only LEDs on controllers[27] Yes[27] ? ?
PlayStation VR2 Inside-out tracking by 4 embedded cameras[28] Yes No Controllers only Infrared (controller LEDs)[28] Yes[28] ? ?

A question mark means that no figure was found in a manufacturer specification or an independent measurement.

Tracking approaches

Outside-in and inside-out

When optical emitters and sensors are used for tracking, the designer has to decide whether to put the light sources on the moving object and the sensors in the environment, or the other way round. Welch and Foxlin, in a 2002 survey of motion tracking in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, note that the first arrangement is usually called outside-looking-in and the second inside-looking-out, but warn that the labels "can be misleading". Their example is a measurement system with optical sensors on the target and spinning light sources in the room that sweep planes of light across them: the sensors look outward, yet the system has the orientation sensitivity of an outside-in design. In their view, the real distinguishing factor is whether the bearing angles to reference points are measured from the outside or the inside.[11]

Valve's Lighthouse system works in the same swept-light way, so it is classified differently by different writers. Niehorster, Li and Lappe describe the HTC Vive tracker as operating on "a so-called inside-out principle, where no external cameras are needed", because the photodiodes on the headset and controllers do the sensing while the two base stations only emit light.[20] The table above follows that description.

An outside-in camera system, such as Constellation on the Oculus Rift or the PlayStation Camera used with PlayStation VR, keeps the tracked object simple (it only has to carry lights) but needs cameras placed around the play area. Oculus recommended additional sensors for 360-degree and room-scale use, because the user's own body could block the LEDs from a single camera's view.[16] Inside-out camera systems such as Oculus Insight, WorldSense and the tracking in PlayStation VR2 need no external hardware and track the headset against the room itself.[26][15]

Markers

Marker-based systems follow reference points that the manufacturer builds into the hardware. These can be active light sources, such as the infrared LEDs of Constellation and the Wii's Sensor Bar or the visible lights on the PlayStation VR headset, or sensors, such as the photodiodes that Lighthouse base stations sweep with lasers.[17][22][23] Markerless inside-out systems instead use natural features of the environment. Oculus Insight is built on visual-inertial simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), which fuses camera images with IMU data to fix the headset's position within a map of the room that is updated continuously.[26] Most current headsets combine the two approaches: the headset tracks itself without markers, while the hand controllers carry infrared LEDs that the headset's cameras follow.[26][28]

Welch and Foxlin identify the main weakness shared by all optical systems as the need for "a clear line of sight between the source and the sensor".[11]

Inertial sensing and sensor fusion

Most systems in the table also carry inertial sensors (gyroscopes and accelerometers) in the tracked device. Inertial sensors need no emitters in the room and have very low latency, but they drift: Welch and Foxlin calculate that an accelerometer bias of just 1 milli-g would make a position estimate drift by 4.5 meters after 30 seconds.[11] For that reason inertial data is combined through sensor fusion with an absolute reference. The sensor that Oculus built for its 2013 Rift prototypes tracked head orientation only: it sampled at up to 1,000 Hz and used the accelerometer's estimate of the "down" vector and a magnetometer to correct the gyroscope's drift.[29] The DK2 added an array of infrared LEDs and a near-infrared CMOS camera running at 60 Hz for position, alongside a gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer updating at 1,000 Hz.[14]

In the HTC Vive, the headset's pose is updated mainly by dead reckoning from its IMUs, and the Lighthouse measurements correct the accumulated error at a rate of 120 Hz. When both base stations are out of view, the Vive stops updating position and orientation instead of continuing on inertial data alone.[20] Windows Mixed Reality controllers behave differently: when a controller leaves the headset cameras' field of view it keeps returning high-accuracy poses for a short time from inertial tracking, then falls back to an approximate position locked to the user's body while still reporting its true orientation.[27]

Other sensing methods

Optical tracking is not the only option. Ivan Sutherland's 1968 head-mounted display (Sword of Damocles) used a mechanical tracker made of a telescoping arm with a universal joint at each end, supplemented by a continuous-wave acoustic tracker that measured the phase shift of the received signal.[11] Acoustic trackers have their update rate limited by room reverberation, and continuous-wave designs suffer from multipath reflections, while magnetic trackers need no line of sight because magnetic fields pass through the human body, but they are distorted by nearby metal and their positional jitter grows with the fourth power of the distance from the source.[11]

Electromagnetic tracking was used in the Control controller of the Magic Leap One AR headset. According to its 2018 FCC filing, reported by Road to VR, the controller contains "a transmitter that generates 3 orthogonal AC magnetic fields at frequencies ranging from 28.5 kHz to 42.42 kHz", which gives it six degrees of freedom.[30]

Radio positioning is used mainly in larger installations. IndoTraq introduced a tracking tag at CES 2016 that combined an IMU with ultra-wideband (UWB) radio positioning; the company quoted a precision of plus or minus 5 mm and an update rate of 200 Hz.[31]

Systems in the table

Oculus Rift (Constellation)

Constellation uses an array of infrared LEDs on each tracked device, followed by an external camera.[17] It first shipped with the DK2 in 2014, when Oculus described its accuracy as sub-millimeter.[14] The Oculus Touch controllers, released on 6 December 2016, use the same outside-in LED tracking. Oculus's recommended layouts at the time included two sensors on opposite sides for standing 360-degree play and three sensors in a triangle for room-scale play.[16]

IndoTraq (HSVT)

IndoTraq's High Speed Vision Tracking (HSVT) combines inside-out camera tracking on a headset with the company's HSKT tracking tag, which fuses UWB radio ranging with IMU data. In the company's 2018 white paper for location-based VR, the UWB and IMU tag provides an absolute position with 5 mm precision and 5 ms measurement latency, gives the camera tracking its starting position, and corrects its drift over large spaces; IndoTraq demonstrated the combination with the inside-out tracking of the HTC Vive Focus.[19][18] IndoTraq describes HSVT as having sub-millimeter precision, but its own pages give different update rates: 300 Hz on the virtual reality use-case page and 100 Hz on a 2024 product page.[18][32]

HTC Vive and SteamVR (Lighthouse)

In the original HTC Vive, two base stations alternately send out horizontal and vertical infrared laser sweeps spanning 120 degrees in each direction. Photodiodes on the headset and controllers register when the laser hits them, and the differences in hit times give the device's position and orientation.[20] Valve licenses the technology to other manufacturers as SteamVR Tracking without licensing fees. Its documentation describes base stations that sweep the room with sync pulses and laser lines to about 5 meters, up to 32 sensors per tracked object, a 1,000 Hz IMU, tracking at 250 Hz to 1 kHz, and "sub-millimeter accuracy".[33] The second-generation base stations sold with the Valve Index use a single rotor; Valve lists a 160 by 115 degree field of view, a range of 7 m, and support for up to four base stations covering a play space of up to 10 m by 10 m.[34]

Microsoft HoloLens

The first-generation HoloLens carries its tracking sensors in the visor. They include one IMU, four environment understanding cameras and one depth camera. Microsoft's documentation for the device is now in its archived previous-versions library.[21]

Nintendo Wii Remote

The Wii Remote contains a 1024 by 768 infrared camera with built-in hardware blob tracking of up to four points at 100 Hz, and a 3-axis accelerometer that also operates at 100 Hz.[12] The camera follows the Sensor Bar, which has five infrared lights on the front of each side.[22] Johnny Chung Lee showed that the same camera could be used for head tracking in "desktop VR" by pointing a Wii Remote at a pair of infrared LEDs worn on the head.[12]

Sony PlayStation VR

PlayStation VR relies on the PlayStation Camera, which captures the position, angle and movement of the headset; the headset's tracking lights glow blue and it contains a 6-axis motion sensing system (3-axis gyroscope and 3-axis accelerometer).[23] At GDC 2015 Sony said that its revised Project Morpheus prototype had nine LEDs "to support robust 360 degree tracking" and a latency of less than 18 ms, about half that of the first prototype.[24] The PlayStation Move controllers, announced for PlayStation 3 in March 2010, combine a three-axis gyroscope, a three-axis accelerometer and a terrestrial magnetic field sensor with a color-changing sphere that is tracked by the camera.[13]

Google WorldSense

WorldSense is Google's inside-out positional tracking system. On the Lenovo Mirage Solo it uses a pair of cameras on the front of the headset for 6DoF head tracking, while the included controller is limited to 3DoF rotation. In its May 2018 review, Road to VR called the headset's positional tracking "robust, accurate, and low latency".[25]

Oculus Insight

Oculus Insight, introduced with the Oculus Quest and Oculus Rift S in 2019, uses ultra-wide-angle cameras in the headset, IMUs in the headset and controllers, and infrared LEDs in the controllers that the headset cameras detect. Facebook engineers wrote that the system computes a position for the headset and controllers every millisecond, that its precision goal was in the sub-millimeter range, and that it was validated against OptiTrack motion capture systems installed in Facebook workspaces and employees' homes, across hundreds of environments with different lighting, decorations and room sizes.[26][35]

Windows Mixed Reality

Windows Mixed Reality headsets and their motion controllers need no external tracking sensors; the headset tracks the controllers optically.[27] Microsoft announced in December 2023 that Windows Mixed Reality was deprecated, and Windows 11 version 24H2 removed support entirely. Microsoft said existing devices would keep working with Steam through November 2026 on Windows 11 version 23H2.[36]

PlayStation VR2

PlayStation VR2, released on 22 February 2023, dropped the external camera of the first PlayStation VR. Four cameras embedded in the headset track both the headset and the PS VR2 Sense controllers, which are followed through a tracking ring across the bottom of each controller.[15] Sony's specifications list a six-axis motion sensing system in both the headset and the controllers and IR LEDs in the controllers for position tracking.[28][37]

Published accuracy and latency measurements

Welch and Foxlin separate tracker error into several quantities: spatial distortion (repeatable errors across the working volume), spatial jitter (noise while the tracker is still), creep (slow changes over time), latency, latency jitter and dynamic error during motion.[11] Independent studies usually measure only some of these, with their own reference systems and room setups.

Study Systems tested Setup Main findings
Niehorster, Li and Lappe (2017)[20] HTC Vive (first-generation Lighthouse) Tracking areas of 8 by 4 m and 4 by 4 m; comparison with a research-grade WorldViz Precision Position Tracking system Sample-to-sample RMS jitter below 0.02 cm and 0.02 degrees; end-to-end latency of about 22 ms (an upper bound); reference plane tilted relative to the floor, with large offsets after tracking was briefly lost
Holzwarth, Gisler, Hirt and Kunz (2021)[38] Oculus Quest 2 (Oculus Insight); SteamVR Tracking 2.0 with HTC Vive Trackers 5 by 5 m room-scale setup Quest 2 significantly more accurate in the height of a tracked object and substantially more precise in position than SteamVR Tracking
Banaszczyk et al. (2024)[39] Meta Quest 2; Meta Quest Pro Industrial robot replaying head trajectories recorded with motion capture during VR games Both headsets showed high positioning accuracy, with no significant difference between them
Singh, Sharma, Liaqat and Kalawsky (2025)[40] Magic Leap 2; HTC Vive XR Elite User walking freely in a 6 by 4 m factory-like space, compared with a Vicon motion capture system Mean positional error 68.188 mm (standard deviation 37.911 mm) for Magic Leap 2 and 124.510 mm (standard deviation 61.212 mm) for Vive XR Elite; mean anchor drift 0.6 mm and 30.1 mm

Niehorster and colleagues concluded that the precision of the first-generation Vive was high and its latency low, but that the shifting offset between the virtual and physical tracking space made it unsuitable at the time for experiments that need accurate visual simulation of self-motion.[20] Holzwarth and colleagues judged the Quest 2 suitable for a wide range of research and industrial uses, while noting that latency and rooms with fewer landmarks or different lighting still needed study.[38]

See also

References

  1. ↑ StereoLabs. Positional Tracking. Retrieved from https://www.stereolabs.com/documentation/overview/positional-tracking/introduction.html
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Lang, B. (2013). An introduction to positional tracking and degrees of freedom (DOF). Retrieved from http://www.roadtovr.com/introduction-positional-tracking-degrees-freedom-dof/
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Rohr, F. (2015). Positional tracking in VR: what it is and how it works. Retrieved from http://data-reality.com/positional-tracking-in-vr-what-it-is-and-how-it-works
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Boger, Y. (2014). Overview of positional tracking technologies for virtual reality. Retrieved from http://www.roadtovr.com/overview-of-positional-tracking-technologies-virtual-reality/
  5. ↑ RealVision. The dilemma of positional tracking in cinematic vr films. Retrieved from http://realvision.ae/blog/2016/06/the-dilemma-of-positional-tracking-in-cinematic-vr-films/
  6. ↑ IndoTraq. Positional Tracking. Retrieved from http://indotraq.com/?page_id=122
  7. ↑ Hands-On With Indotraq. Retrieved from https://www.vrfocus.com/2016/01/hands-on-with-indotraq/
  8. ↑ INDOTRAQ INDOOR TRACKING FOR VIRTUAL REALITY. Retrieved from https://blog.abt.com/2016/01/ces-2016-indotraq-indoor-tracking-for-virtual-reality/
  9. ↑ Buckley, S. (2015). This is how Valve’s amazing lighthouse tracking technology works. Retrieved from http://gizmodo.com/this-is-how-valve-s-amazing-lighthouse-tracking-technol-1705356768
  10. ↑ Grubb, J. (2016). Why positional tracking for mobile virtual reality is so damn hard. Retrieved from https://venturebeat.com/2016/02/24/why-positional-tracking-for-mobile-virtual-reality-is-so-damn-hard
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 Greg Welch, Eric Foxlin (2002). "Motion Tracking: No Silver Bullet, but a Respectable Arsenal". IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 22, no. 6. pp. 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2002.1046626. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Johnny Chung Lee (2008). "Johnny Chung Lee - Projects - Wii". johnnylee.net. http://johnnylee.net/projects/wii/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 "PlayStation Move Motion Controller Delivers a Whole New Entertainment Experience to PlayStation 3". Sony Interactive Entertainment. Sony Computer Entertainment. 2010-03-10. https://sonyinteractive.com/en/press-releases/2010/playstationmove-motion-controller-delivers-a-whole-new-entertainment-experience-to-playstation3/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 Ben Lang (2014-03-19). "GDC 2014: Oculus Rift Developer Kit 2 (DK2) Pre-orders Start Today for $350, Ships in July". Road to VR. https://roadtovr.com/oculus-rift-developer-kit-2-dk2-pre-order-release-date-specs-gdc-2014/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Sid Shuman (2023-02-06). "PlayStation VR2: The ultimate FAQ". PlayStation.Blog. Sony Interactive Entertainment. https://blog.playstation.com/2023/02/06/playstation-vr2-the-ultimate-faq/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 Nate Kozak (2016-10-14). "Oculus Touch Will Support 360 and Room-scale Tracking With Extra Cameras". Road to VR. https://www.roadtovr.com/oculus-touch-support-room-scale-360-tracking-extra-cameras-sensor/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Ben Lang (2016-05-03). "One Year Later, Oculus and Valve Still Mum on Timeline to Open Tracking to Third-parties". Road to VR. https://www.roadtovr.com/oculus-constellation-valve-lighthouse-open-tracking-third-party-api/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 "Use Case: Virtual Reality". IndoTraq. IndoTraq LLC. 2020-12-30. https://indotraq.com/use-case-virtual-reality-and-augmented-reality/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 "Sub Millimeter 3D Wireless Positional Tracking for Location Based VR (LBVR)". IndoTraq. IndoTraq LLC. 2018-09. https://www.indotraq.com/wp-content/uploads/Whitepaper-LBVR.pdf. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  20. ↑ 20.00 20.01 20.02 20.03 20.04 20.05 20.06 20.07 20.08 20.09 Diederick C. Niehorster, Li Li, Markus Lappe (2017). "The Accuracy and Precision of Position and Orientation Tracking in the HTC Vive Virtual Reality System for Scientific Research". i-Perception, vol. 8, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517708205. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 "HoloLens (1st gen) hardware". Microsoft Learn. Microsoft. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/mixed-reality/hololens-1/hololens1-hardware. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 "How to Check Functionality of the Sensor Bar (Wii)". Nintendo Support. Nintendo. https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/2954/~/how-to-check-functionality-of-the-sensor-bar-(wii). Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 "PlayStation VR Instruction Manual (CUH-ZVR1)". PlayStation.com. Sony Interactive Entertainment. https://www.playstation.com/content/dam/global_pdc/en/corporate/support/manuals/psvr-docs/cuh-zvr1/EN_PSVR_CUH-ZVR1_Instruction_Manual_Web.pdf. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Shuhei Yoshida (2015-03-03). "Project Morpheus: PS4 VR Upgraded, Coming in 2016". PlayStation.Blog. Sony Computer Entertainment. https://blog.playstation.com/2015/03/03/project-morpheus-ps4-vr-upgraded-coming-in-2016/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Ben Lang (2018-05-04). "Lenovo Mirage Solo Review: Positional Tracking Comes to Mobile VR (sort of)". Road to VR. https://roadtovr.com/lenovo-mirage-solo-review-positional-tracking-comes-to-mobile-vr-sort-of/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 26.5 26.6 26.7 Joel Hesch, Anna Kozminski, Oskar Linde (2019-08-22). "Powered by AI: Oculus Insight". Meta AI. Meta. https://ai.meta.com/blog/powered-by-ai-oculus-insight/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 "Motion controllers". Microsoft Learn. Microsoft. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/design/motion-controllers. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 "PS VR2 Tech Specs". PlayStation.com. Sony Interactive Entertainment. https://www.playstation.com/en-us/ps-vr2/ps-vr2-tech-specs/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  29. ↑ Oculus VR (2013-01-04). "Building a Sensor for Low Latency VR". Meta Quest Blog. Meta. https://www.meta.com/blog/building-a-sensor-for-low-latency-vr/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  30. ↑ Scott Hayden (2018-06-21). "Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, Release on Track for 2018". Road to VR. https://www.roadtovr.com/magic-leap-one-motion-controller-appears-fcc-filing-suggesting-2018-headset-launch/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  31. ↑ "IndoTraq LLC Introduces the Fastest and Most Precise Wireless Indoor Tracking System in the World This Week at CES 2016". PRWeb. IndoTraq LLC. 2016-01-06. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/12/prweb13145665.htm. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  32. ↑ "IndoTraq's High Speed Vision Tracking (HSVT)". IndoTraq. IndoTraq LLC. 2024-04-09. https://indotraq.com/indotraqs-high-speed-vision-tracking-hsvt/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  33. ↑ "SteamVR Tracking". Steamworks. Valve Corporation. https://partner.steamgames.com/vrlicensing. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  34. ↑ "Base Stations - Valve Index". Valve Index. Valve Corporation. https://www.valvesoftware.com/en/index/base-stations. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  35. ↑ Ian Hamilton (2019-08-22). "Oculus Insight: Facebook Details Quest's Inside Out Tracking System". UploadVR. https://www.uploadvr.com/oculus-insight-details-quest/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  36. ↑ David Heaney (2024-10-01). "Windows MR Headsets No Longer Work In Windows 11 24H2". UploadVR. https://www.uploadvr.com/windows-11-24h2-kills-windows-mr-support/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  37. ↑ Hideaki Nishino (2022-01-04). "PlayStation VR2 and PlayStation VR2 Sense controller: the next generation of VR gaming on PS5". PlayStation.Blog. Sony Interactive Entertainment. https://blog.playstation.com/2022/01/04/playstation-vr2-and-playstation-vr2-sense-controller-the-next-generation-of-vr-gaming-on-ps5/. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 Valentin Holzwarth, Joy Gisler, Christian Hirt, Andreas Kunz (2021). "Comparing the Accuracy and Precision of SteamVR Tracking 2.0 and Oculus Quest 2 in a Room Scale Setup". Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulations (ICVARS 2021). pp. 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463914.3463921. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  39. ↑ Adam Banaszczyk, Mikołaj Łysakowski, Michał R. Nowicki, Piotr Skrzypczyński, Sławomir K. Tadeja (2024). "How Accurate is the Positioning in VR? Using Motion Capture and Robotics to Compare Positioning Capabilities of Popular VR Headsets". 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), arXiv preprint. doi:10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00027. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06116. Retrieved 2026-09-27.
  40. ↑ Shubham Singh, Yash Sharma, Amer Liaqat, Roy S. Kalawsky (2025-07-22). "Evaluation of XR device's real-world tracking accuracy and depth perception from an industrial point of view". Virtual Reality, vol. 29, article 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01192-3. Retrieved 2026-09-27.

References

Retrieved from "https://vrarwiki.com/index.php?title=Positional_tracking&oldid=41100"
Contents