Toggle search
Toggle menu
5.4K
6.1K
229
52.7K
VR & AR Wiki
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Light field display

vrarwiki.com · VR & AR Wiki
More actions
(Redirected from Light Field Displays)
See also: Terms and Technical Terms

Light field display (LFD) is a display technology that aims to reproduce a light field, the light traveling in every direction through every point in a region of space, described by the position, direction and intensity of light rays.[1][2] A conventional 2D panel shows the same image in every direction, and a stereoscopic system sends one fixed image to each eye. A light field display instead controls the direction of the emitted light, so that observers at different positions see different images. In the words of a 2013 survey of computational displays, light field displays "generally aim to create motion parallax and stereoscopic disparity so that an observer perceives a scene as 3D without having to wear encumbering glasses".[3][4] Masahiro Yamaguchi's 2016 review notes that a display able to reproduce a light field exactly as it leaves a real object would satisfy all depth cues of human vision; practical devices only sample the light field, in a limited number of directions, and many of them leave out vertical parallax to reduce the amount of data.[5][6]

Light field displays are studied for virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) because current head-mounted displays show their images at a fixed focal distance. The eyes converge on a virtual object at one distance while focusing on the display at another, which produces the vergence-accommodation conflict (VAC).[7][8] If a display emits enough distinct rays per point that several of them enter the pupil, the eye can focus at the depth of the virtual object, so that focus cues agree with vergence.[3][9] In experiments with a display that presented correct or nearly correct focus cues, Hoffman and colleagues found reduced viewer fatigue and discomfort.[10] The near-eye light field company CREAL states that its displays allow prolonged use without visual conflict, eye strain or nausea.[11] Light field displays are one of several proposed answers to the VAC: a 2021 review of AR and VR optics also covers varifocal, multifocal, holographic and Maxwellian-view designs, and concludes that, because integral imaging trades resolution for views, multifocal or varifocal displays are "a relatively practical and effective solution" for VR headsets.[12]

The term is applied to a wide range of hardware. Research papers reserve focus cues for displays with very high angular resolution, while companies have used "light field", "lightfield" or "holographic" for products ranging from multiview panels and eye-tracked stereoscopic monitors to multifocal headsets.[3][13][14][15] The section below sets out how the academic definitions and the commercial usage differ.

Reviewed 13 October 2026. Verified all DOIs via Crossref and checked the cited review papers and company, press and patent sources for the definitions, products, dates and figures. About review dates.

Definition and principles

A light field display aims to replicate the plenoptic function. Edward Adelson and James Bergen introduced the term in 1991 for a function describing the light observed from every position in every direction, including its intensity, color (wavelength) and variation over time.[16][3] In practice, displays generate a sampled approximation of the four-dimensional subset that describes rays by position and direction.[17] Marc Levoy and Pat Hanrahan treated captured images as two-dimensional slices of this 4D function and parameterized each ray by where it crosses two planes, a description that display research later adopted.[18][17]

By controlling the direction as well as the color and intensity of emitted rays, a light field display with enough angular resolution lets the eye focus (accommodation) at different depths within the displayed scene, matching the depth signaled by binocular vergence.[3][9] Depending on the design, a light field display can provide:

  • Motion parallax, horizontal only or horizontal and vertical (full parallax).[3][19]
  • Correct perspective and occlusion cues as the viewer moves.[5][3]
  • Focus cues, when several rays from the same scene point enter the pupil, which reduces the vergence-accommodation conflict.[3][7]
  • View-dependent appearance, since each direction can carry a different image.[18]
  • Viewing without glasses, which applies to desktop and large-format displays; near-eye designs are themselves worn on the head.[3][9]

Light field, multiview and autostereoscopic displays

There is no single agreed threshold at which a glasses-free 3D display becomes a "light field display", and the literature uses overlapping terms. Masia and colleagues group light field displays under automultiscopic displays, glasses-free displays that show stereo images from several viewpoints, and name parallax barriers and integral imaging with lenslet arrays as the two principles behind most of them.[3] They treat focus support as a separate, harder class: displays "supporting correct accommodation are able to create a light field with enough angular resolution to allow subtle, yet crucial, variation over the pupil", for example super-multiview displays that generate a very large number of views at high hardware cost.[3]

Pierre-Alexandre Blanche's 2021 review gives a graded set of definitions. An autostereoscopic display projects the left and right views to the viewer's eyes with parallax barriers or microlens arrays and requires the viewer to be at a particular position. A display that also reproduces motion parallax is called "multiview", and a display that can additionally reconstruct images in front of or behind the screen is "usually called a light-field display". Blanche estimates that stereo needs at least two views per interpupillary distance, that smooth motion parallax needs on the order of one view per degree, and that light field displays "can reproduce some amount of accommodation when the ray density is sufficiently large".[6]

These definitions are the background to disputes over product names. Several displays sold as light field displays present from a few dozen up to about 100 views across a fixed viewing cone, or steer a stereo pair to the tracked eyes of one viewer.[13][20][21] The commercial products section lists each company's own term next to independent or academic descriptions of the hardware.

Characteristics

  • Glasses-free 3D: Desktop, tabletop and large-format light field displays are viewed without glasses. Untracked multiview designs can serve several viewers at once, each from their own position, while tracked designs follow one viewer.[3][13][22]
  • Full or horizontal-only parallax: Full-parallax displays provide both horizontal and vertical parallax. Many multiview systems omit vertical parallax because including both directions squares the amount of data. The 2007 USC spinning-mirror display, for example, projects views 1.25 degrees apart around the display and renders correct vertical perspective and parallax when a tracking system measures each viewer's height and distance.[6][17][23]
  • Focus cues: Displays with high enough angular resolution, especially near-eye designs, can present virtual objects at appropriate focal distances, aligning accommodation and vergence.[9][24]
  • Computational requirements: Generating many views or directional patterns requires substantial GPU work and data bandwidth. Blanche estimates the raw data rate of a 4K full-parallax display with smooth motion parallax over plus or minus 45 degrees at the order of 105 Gb/s.[6][9]
  • Resolution trade-offs: Designs must balance spatial resolution (image sharpness), angular resolution (number and spacing of views), field of view (FoV) and depth of field. This is usually called the spatio-angular resolution trade-off.[3][9]

History and development

Early concepts and foundations

Michael Faraday proposed in an 1846 lecture, "Thoughts on Ray Vibrations", that light should be interpreted as a field. The Soviet physicist A. Gershun defined the light field concept in a 1936 paper on photometry, giving the amount of light traveling in every direction through every point in space; an English translation by P. Moon and G. Timoshenko appeared in 1939.[1][25]

Display techniques came earlier than the term. Frederic Ives patented the parallax stereogram in 1903, placing occluding barriers in front of an image so that it changed with the viewer's position. In 1908 Gabriel Lippmann proposed using an array of small lenses instead, an approach he called integral photography (photographie intégrale).[3][26] These two principles, barriers and lenslets, still underlie most light field displays.[3] The modern computational treatment followed Adelson and Bergen's plenoptic function (1991) and the light field rendering work of Levoy and Hanrahan (1996).[16][18] Writing in 2006, Levoy observed that display of light fields had progressed more slowly than capture, because interpolation between sparse samples "can't be performed digitally, only optically".[1]

Key development milestones

Selected milestones in light field display research and products
Year Milestone
1846 Michael Faraday proposes that light be interpreted as a field.[1]
1903 Frederic Ives patents the parallax stereogram, a barrier-based autostereoscopic image.[3]
1908 Gabriel Lippmann proposes integral photography using a lenslet array.[26]
1936 A. Gershun defines the light field (English translation 1939).[25]
1991 Adelson and Bergen define the plenoptic function.[16]
1996 Levoy and Hanrahan publish "Light field rendering" at SIGGRAPH.[18]
2004 Matusik and Pfister at Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories present an end-to-end 3D TV system with an autostereoscopic display.[27][1]
2005 Stanford's large camera array is published for light field capture.[28]
2007 Jones, McDowall, Yamada, Bolas and Debevec show an interactive 360 degree light field display based on a spinning mirror; it won the Best Emerging Technology award at SIGGRAPH 2007.[23][29]
2008 Hoffman, Girshick, Akeley and Banks show that vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause fatigue.[10]
2010-2013 Multilayer, compressive and tensor light field displays are introduced: content-adaptive parallax barriers (2010), tensor displays (2012) and the Focus 3D accommodation display (2013).[30][4][31]
2013 Fattal and colleagues at HP Labs publish a multi-directional diffractive backlight in Nature; Fattal and his co-founders later started Leia Inc. as an HP Labs spinoff.[19][21]
2013 NVIDIA researchers Douglas Lanman and David Luebke present a near-eye light field display prototype using microlens arrays.[32]
2014 Hua and Javidi demonstrate an optical see-through head-mounted display that uses microscopic integral imaging with freeform optics.[33]
2015 Huang, Chen and Wetzstein present the light field stereoscope, a near-eye display with two stacked LCDs and focus cues.[24]
2017 Avegant announces a "Light Field Technology" for mixed reality headsets that shows objects at multiple focal planes. Magic Leap announces the Magic Leap One with what it calls a "Digital Lightfield".[15][34]
2018 Japan Display Inc. and NHK Media Technology add video playback to a 17-inch light field display built on an 8K LCD.[35]
2020 Sony releases the Spatial Reality Display (ELF-SR1); Looking Glass Factory unveils an 8K display and launches the Looking Glass Portrait on Kickstarter.[20][36][22]
2021 CREAL shows its first light field AR and VR headset prototypes; Google announces Project Starline; Light Field Lab unveils its SolidLight platform.[37][38][39]
2023 Light Field Lab raises a $50 million round led by NCSoft; Sony announces the 27-inch ELF-SR2; Leia acquires Dimenco and Philips' 3D patent portfolio.[40][41][21]
2025 Looking Glass opens orders for a 27-inch 5K light field display and introduces a separate Hololuminescent Display line; HP announces the HP Dimension with Google Beam (formerly Project Starline); CREAL raises $8.9 million in a round led by ZEISS; a Nature paper reports the EyeReal full-parallax display.[42][43][44][45][46]

Technical implementations (how they work)

Light field displays use several techniques, often in combination, to generate a 4D light field:

  • Microlens arrays (MLAs) and integral imaging: A high-resolution panel (LCD or OLED) is covered with an array of tiny lenses. Each lenslet sends light from the pixels beneath it in different directions, creating different views for different positions.[3][9] This is the approach derived from Lippmann's integral photography. The trade-off is explicit: spatial resolution depends on the number of lenslets, angular resolution on the number of pixels behind each lenslet.[1][3] Lanman and Luebke's analysis of near-eye MLA displays sets out trade-offs between resolution, field of view and depth of field.[9] Lenticular lens sheets are a related optic; Sony's Spatial Reality Display, for example, uses a "micro-optical lenticular lens" over a 4K panel.[14]
  • Multilayer displays (stacked LCDs): Several light-attenuating layers, typically LCD panels, are stacked with gaps between them. The patterns on each layer are computed jointly, often by nonnegative matrix or tensor factorization, and shown faster than the eye's flicker threshold, so the viewer perceives a low-rank approximation of the target light field.[3][4][30] The light field stereoscope applied a two-layer factorization to a near-eye display.[24]
  • Directional backlighting: A standard LCD is combined with a backlight that emits light in controlled directions. Focus 3D paired multilayer panels with a high-angular-resolution backlight to generate near-correct accommodation cues,[3][31] and the HP Labs diffractive backlight used a thin planar lightguide with diffractive structures to produce a 64-view, full-parallax image with a 90 degree view zone at 88 pixels per inch.[19]
  • Projector arrays: Many projectors illuminate a screen that passes light in a narrow range of directions. In Holografika's HoloVizio design, optical modules project beams that hit each screen point from different angles, and a "holographic screen" with direction-selective properties re-emits them; each perceived view is assembled from several modules rather than from a single projected image.[17]
  • Parallax barriers: An opaque layer with slits or apertures is placed in front of or between display panels, so that different pixels are visible from different angles. Barriers block much of the light, so they are less light-efficient than lenslets.[3] Barrier-based light field displays have also been used for vision correction; Huang and colleagues placed a pinhole-array mask in front of an iPod touch screen and prefiltered the content.[47]
  • Waveguide optics: AR glasses usually relay the image through thin waveguides with grating couplers, which present the image at a fixed depth, normally at infinity. Adding depths generally means stacking further waveguide layers.[12] The Magic Leap One, marketed with a "Digital Lightfield", used two sets of red, green and blue waveguide layers per eye to form two focal planes, according to iFixit's teardown.[34][48]
  • Time-multiplexed displays: Different views, focal planes or illumination patterns are presented rapidly in sequence; if cycled faster than the eye can follow, they fuse into a single perceived light field or volume. The USC 360 degree display projected 4,800 binary frames per second onto a spinning mirror,[29] multifocal head-mounted displays can address several focal planes in sequence,[12][49] and a CREAL patent application describes a near-eye projector in which point light sources fire in sequence through a spatial light modulator, creating a series of "pinhole-aperture light-fields".[50]
  • Holographic and diffractive approaches: A light field can be generated by reconstructing rays or by reconstructing wavefronts; the second approach is holography.[5] Holographic displays reconstruct wavefronts through diffraction,[51] and Blanche describes holographic stereograms as hybrids "falling between light-field displays and holographic displays".[6] Several companies use "holographic" in marketing for ray-based displays; Light Field Lab calls SolidLight a "holographic display platform", and Looking Glass describes its products as showing holograms.[39][43]

Types of light field displays

  • Near-eye light field displays: Built into VR and AR HMDs, mainly to provide focus cues and reduce the VAC.[9][11] Examples include research prototypes from NVIDIA[32] and academic groups,[24][33] and display modules from CREAL. CREAL's 2021 AR prototype had a 1,000 x 1,000 light field over a 60 degree field of view; its VR prototype placed a 1,000 x 1,000 light field in the central 30 degrees inside a conventional 1,600 x 1,440 view extending to 100 degrees.[37] Designs use MLAs, stacked LCDs, sequential pinhole projection, or combinations with varifocal optics.[9][24][50][12]
  • Desktop and tabletop displays: Glasses-free 3D for one viewer or a small group, used for professional visualization, design review, content creation and communication. Looking Glass Factory has made glasses-free displays, which it calls light field displays, in several sizes, including the 7.9-inch Looking Glass Portrait and 16-inch and 27-inch models.[22][42] Sony's Spatial Reality Display uses eye tracking for a single viewer,[20] and Leia Inc. supplies switchable 2D/3D panels for monitors, laptops, tablets and phones.[21] These products mostly use lenticular optics, switchable liquid crystal lenses or diffractive backlights over LCD or OLED panels.[14][21][19]
  • Large-format and tiled displays: Aimed at glasses-free 3D for public venues, command centers and collaborative work.[40][17] Light Field Lab's SolidLight platform uses 28-inch modular panels designed to be tiled into larger video walls; the company states that each panel contributes 2.5 billion pixels.[39][40] Holografika's HoloVizio range included a 72-inch, 73-megapixel system with a 70 degree field of view and a 140-inch glasses-free cinema system.[17] Google's Project Starline telepresence booth, now sold as the HP Dimension with Google Beam, uses a 65-inch display that Google calls a light field display.[44][38]

Commercial products and marketing terminology

The table compares how companies describe their displays with independent or academic descriptions of the same hardware. It does not rank the products.

Selected commercial "light field" displays
Company and product Company's description Independent or technical description
Looking Glass Factory (8K, Portrait, 16-inch, 27-inch and other models) "Proprietary light field technology" producing up to 100 views of a scene, without glasses or eye tracking[13] A 2021 review describes a Looking Glass display providing 45 viewpoints within a 58 degree viewing cone.[52] TechCrunch described the 8K unit's "45-element light field" and found the image best from straight on to about 45 degrees.[36]
Looking Glass Hololuminescent Display (2025) A "new category of display" that "builds on our light field expertise" but plays standard video; up to 4K, under one inch thick[43] Looking Glass presents it as separate from its light field displays, which it continues to sell.[43]
Sony Spatial Reality Display (ELF-SR1, 2020; ELF-SR2, 2023) Built on Sony's "Eye-Sensing Light Field Display" (ELFD) technology[14] Sony's own release says the micro optical lens "divides the image into the left and right eyes" for stereoscopic viewing while a high-speed vision sensor follows eye position;[20] Jon Peddie Research called it "a new Stereo 3D display".[14]
Leia Inc. (RED Hydrogen, Lume Pad, partner monitors and laptops) A "holographic" screen for the RED Hydrogen; "natural 3D Lightfield Technology" in its automotive work with Continental[21][53] The Verge reports that Leia first offered several static viewing zones, and that current Leia screens use face tracking and a thin liquid crystal layer to aim the proper image at each eye, at less than half the panel's 2D resolution in 3D mode.[21]
Light Field Lab SolidLight "Holographic display platform" projecting "SolidLight Objects" that move, refract and reflect in physical space[39][40] Published specifications come from the company; GamesBeat reported its figures of a 16K by 10K pixel grid on each 6 by 4 inch module, with fifteen modules forming a 28-inch display.[40]
Avegant light field technology (2017) "Light Field Technology" for mixed reality[15] The announcement describes objects shown at "multiple focal planes", a multifocal approach.[15]
Magic Leap One (2018) "Digital Lightfield" generating "digital light at different depths"[34] iFixit's teardown found two sets of RGB waveguide layers per eye creating two focal planes.[48]
Google Beam / HP Dimension 65-inch "light field display"[44] Google's 2021 research paper describes Project Starline as "a head-tracked autostereoscopic display" with a lenticular display.[54]
CREAL "Light field display" for AR glasses with "real image depth"[11] Road to VR reported CREAL's claim of continuous focal planes, with steps between focal depths "much smaller than an eye can resolve".[37]

Comparison with other 3D display technologies

Comparison of key 3D display technology characteristics
Technology Glasses required Natural focal cues (addresses VAC) Full motion parallax Typical view field Key trade-offs
Light field display No (desktop and large formats); near-eye versions are worn Only with high enough angular resolution (super-multiview or near-eye designs)[3] Full or horizontal-only, depending on design[6] Limited to wide, design dependent (for example 58 degrees for Looking Glass, 90 degrees for the HP Labs backlight)[13][19] Spatio-angular resolution trade-off, computation and bandwidth needs
Stereoscopic displays Yes No No (requires head tracking) Wide VAC causes fatigue, requires glasses
Autostereoscopic (non-LFD) No No Limited (often horizontal only) Limited Reduced resolution per view, fixed viewing zones
Volumetric Display No Yes, within the physical volume[3] Yes 360 degree potential Limited resolution, transparency and occlusion issues, bulk
Holographic displays No Yes Yes Often limited Extreme computational demands, speckle, typically small size[5][46]

Masia and colleagues list the still low spatio-angular resolution, limited depth of field, the need for a thin form factor and the difficulty of generating and transmitting content among the main remaining challenges for automultiscopic displays. Light field displays give depth cues without glasses in many formats, and focus cues in some designs, at the cost of resolution, computation and hardware complexity.[3][9]

Content creation

Content for light field displays needs directional view information, captured or generated:

  • Light field cameras and plenoptic cameras: Capture both the intensity and direction of incoming light, often with microlens arrays over the sensor. Lytro and Raytrix commercialized such cameras.[2][52] Camera arrays such as Stanford's are another capture method.[28]
  • Computer graphics rendering: 3D scenes built in engines such as Unity or Unreal Engine can be rendered from many viewpoints. Looking Glass provides a Unity plugin, and Sony's Spatial Reality Display SDK includes an Unreal Engine plugin.[55][56] Lanman and Luebke's near-eye prototype used GPU-accelerated ray tracing and a "backward compatible" rasterization method that accepts existing stereoscopic content.[32] Neural scene representations such as Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) synthesize new views from captured images,[57] and Leia has demonstrated Gaussian splat scenes on its displays.[21]
  • Photogrammetry and 3D scanning: Scanned models can be loaded and rendered for light field playback; Looking Glass's Model Viewer accepts glTF, FBX, OBJ, STL and PLY files.[55]
  • Conversion of existing content: Software can turn 2D photos, depth photos and 2D video into content for these displays. Looking Glass Studio plays RGB-D and "quilt" images and video, and Leia has shown an app that converts 2D YouTube video to 3D in real time; Leia now groups its software and hardware under the Immersity platform.[55][21][58]
  • Focal stack conversion: Research has explored converting stacks of images focused at different depths into light field representations, particularly for multilayer displays.[4]
  • Coding standards: The JPEG Pleno framework of the JPEG committee covers light field, point cloud and holographic imaging, with a dedicated part for light field coding.[59]

Applications

Applications in VR and AR

  • Near-field realism: Focus cues matter most for objects close to the viewer. Avegant's CTO said in 2017 that "the biggest stumbling block for mixed reality today is creating crystal clear images that are within one meter."[15] Xiong and colleagues note that the VAC may be more serious in AR than in VR, because AR imagery is superimposed on real objects that have correct depth cues.[12]
  • Visual comfort: Reducing the VAC is expected to reduce eye strain and fatigue in longer sessions; Hoffman and colleagues measured reduced fatigue and discomfort with correct or nearly correct focus cues.[10][7]
  • Depth perception and interaction: In the same study, correct focus cues shortened the time needed to identify a stereoscopic stimulus, increased stereoacuity in a time-limited task, and reduced distortions in perceived depth, which bears on hand-eye tasks with virtual objects.[10]
  • AR integration: Near-eye light field and integral-imaging designs let virtual objects appear at focal depths consistent with the real scene, which conventional AR optics with a fixed image plane cannot do.[33][12]
  • Vision correction: Light field displays can predistort their output so that a viewer with refractive errors sees a sharp image without glasses; this requires enough angular resolution that several rays from each lenslet enter the pupil.[3][47] CREAL lists "prescription compatibility" among its features, and in 2024 began licensing a light field-based vision care platform to ZEISS for diagnostic and treatment devices.[11][45]

Other applications

  • Medical imaging, scientific visualization and design: Hoffman and colleagues list medical imaging, surgical training, scientific visualization and virtual prototyping among applications that depend on faithful 3D displays,[10] and JDI and NHK Media Technology aimed their 17-inch light field display at digital archiving, education and medical uses.[35]
  • Entertainment and venues: Light Field Lab expects early SolidLight customers among video wall buyers such as hotels, nightclubs, museums and gaming centers.[40] Holografika built a glasses-free 3D cinema system.[17]
  • Telepresence: Life-size 3D video calls, as in Google's Project Starline and its successor, Google Beam on the HP Dimension, which was announced at $25,000 for enterprise customers with the Beam license sold separately.[60][44][54]
  • Digital signage and advertising: Holografika offered a HoloVizio kiosk system for digital signage, and Looking Glass designed its Hololuminescent Display to work with standard video and advertising infrastructure.[17][43]
  • Automotive displays: Continental's 3D instrument cluster in the 2021 Genesis GV80 used parallax barriers and an interior camera that tracked the driver's line of sight; Continental also announced a display for second-row passengers based on Leia's "natural 3D Lightfield Technology", with production planned for 2022.[53] Leia lists automotive displays among the targets of its Immersity platform.[58]

Challenges and limitations

  • Spatio-angular resolution trade-off: For a fixed pixel count, adding views (angular resolution) lowers the perceived sharpness (spatial resolution).[3][12] Laser Focus World illustrated the effect for JDI's 8K-based light field display: with 40 views, the 3D image would be about 1214 x 683 pixels (JDI did not disclose its actual view count).[35] The Verge reported that Leia's 3D mode delivers less than half of the panel's 2D resolution.[21]
  • Computational complexity and bandwidth: Rendering, compressing and transmitting dense light fields in real time is demanding.[6][12]
  • Manufacturing complexity and cost: Ultrahigh-angular-resolution displays such as super-multiview systems incur high hardware costs, which has limited their size, field of view and spatial resolution.[3] Light Field Lab planned to begin with an artisan build process before moving to a production line.[40]
  • Form factor and miniaturization: A thin form factor remains a major challenge for automultiscopic displays,[3] and Road to VR described CREAL's 2021 headset prototypes as "still fairly large".[37]
  • Limited field of view: Near-eye designs trade field of view against resolution and depth of field;[9] CREAL's 2021 VR prototype confined the light field to the central 30 degrees.[37]
  • Brightness and efficiency: Parallax barriers have very low light throughput, LCD panels transmit only about 3% of light for fully on pixels, and multilayer LCD designs multiply this loss by the number of panels.[3]
  • Visual artifacts: Crosstalk between views, moiré patterns and the "cardboard effect" can affect automultiscopic displays, and the need to filter content to avoid inter-view aliasing limits the depth range that appears sharp.[3] Moving the head out of a stereo display's sweet spot causes crosstalk and blur, which is why Leia's current screens track the viewer's face,[21] and TechCrunch observed that Looking Glass's 8K image became fuzzy beyond about 45 degrees and blurred when objects extended far from the screen.[36]
  • Content ecosystem: Workflows for creating, coding and distributing native light field content are less mature than for 2D or stereoscopic 3D; JPEG Pleno is still being extended,[59] and Looking Glass said its 2025 Hololuminescent Display was designed so that a 3D software pipeline is no longer required.[43]

Key players and commercial landscape

Companies and research groups active in light field displays include:

  • Looking Glass Factory: Brooklyn-based maker of desktop and larger glasses-free displays, including the Looking Glass Portrait (7.9-inch, 2048 x 1536, Kickstarter launch in December 2020 at $199 early pricing),[22] a 27-inch 5K light field display with up to 100 views (pre-orders April 2025, shipping planned for June 2025),[42] and the Hololuminescent Display line announced in September 2025, with 16-, 27- and 86-inch sizes.[43] Its software includes a Unity plugin, Looking Glass Studio and a Bridge SDK.[55]
  • Leia Inc.: An HP Labs spinoff co-founded by David Fattal, whose HP Labs group published the 2013 multi-directional diffractive backlight; Leia designed the screen of the RED Hydrogen phone and later made the Lume Pad tablet, whose successor ZTE released as the Nubia Pad 3D.[19][21] Leia acquired Dimenco and Philips' 3D patent portfolio in 2023, and its technology is used in Acer SpatialLabs and Asus Spatial Vision products.[21][58] According to an April 2026 Mergermarket report, Leia, led by CEO Fabio Esposito since January 2024, had more than 200 employees and more than ten customers including Samsung, Acer and Barco; it might raise $50-100 million, partly to support a push into smartphones, and expected the first OEM devices using its technology to reach the market in early 2028.[58]
  • CREAL: Swiss company developing compact near-eye light field modules for AR and VR glasses; it aims to supply display technology to partners rather than build headsets.[37] In July 2025 it raised $8.9 million in a round led by ZEISS, bringing total funding to $32 million.[45]
  • Light Field Lab: Founded in 2017 by former Lytro staff Jon Karafin, Brendan Bevensee and Ed Ibe; developing large modular SolidLight panels, announced in October 2021.[40][39] Its $50 million round in February 2023 was led by NCSoft and brought total funding to $85 million, according to GamesBeat.[40]
  • Sony: Sells the Spatial Reality Display, an eye-tracked desktop display: the 15.6-inch ELF-SR1 (October 2020, just under $5,000) and the 27-inch 4K ELF-SR2 (2023).[20][41]
  • Avegant: Announced a light field technology for mixed reality in 2017, described as displaying objects at multiple focal planes.[15]
  • Holografika: Hungarian company behind the HoloVizio projector-array light field displays.[17]
  • Japan Display Inc. (JDI): Developed a 17-inch light field display with NHK Media Technology, based on JDI's 8K LCD.[35]
  • NVIDIA: Research on near-eye light field displays, including the 2013 Lanman and Luebke prototype.[32]
  • Google: Project Starline, now Google Beam, with HP as the first hardware partner.[38][44]
  • Academic research: Groups at the MIT Media Lab (multilayer and tensor displays),[3][4] Stanford (the light field stereoscope),[7][24] the USC Institute for Creative Technologies (360 degree display)[29] and many optics laboratories continue work on light field displays.[52][12]

Future directions and research

  • Computational display optimization: Optimization algorithms and, more recently, neural networks compute the patterns for multilayer displays and directional backlights.[4] In 2025 Ma and colleagues at Shanghai AI Laboratory and Fudan University reported EyeReal, which tracks the viewer's eyes and uses a neural network to compute the light field for the current eye positions on a stack of three standard LCD panels. The authors report seamless viewing angles beyond 100 degrees with horizontal, vertical and focal parallax, frame rates above 50 Hz at 1,920 x 1,080 resolution on consumer hardware, and state that the display has no vergence-accommodation conflict.[46][61] Neural representations such as NeRF are used for view synthesis.[57]
  • Varifocal and multifocal integration: Hybrids combine light field principles with focus-tunable elements; integral imaging combined with varifocal optics can relax the trade-off between resolution and depth of field.[12][49]
  • Miniaturization for wearables: Work on metasurfaces (including achromatic metalens arrays for integral imaging), holographic optical elements (HOEs), waveguides and MicroLED light engines targets light field optics for glasses.[12][45]
  • Content capture and creation tools: Plenoptic cameras, AI-driven view synthesis and simpler software workflows.[57][55]
  • Higher resolution and efficiency: New materials, optical designs (for example polarization multiplexing[62]) and display technologies address the spatio-angular trade-off and light efficiency.[3]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Marc Levoy (2006-08). "Light Fields and Computational Imaging". Computer (IEEE Computer Society), vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2006.270. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Gordon Wetzstein, Ivo Ihrke, Douglas Lanman, Wolfgang Heidrich (2011). "Computational Plenoptic Imaging". Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 2397-2426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.02073.x. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  3. ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 3.25 3.26 3.27 3.28 3.29 3.30 3.31 Belen Masia, Gordon Wetzstein, Piotr Didyk, Diego Gutierrez (2013). "A survey on computational displays: Pushing the boundaries of optics, computation, and perception". Computers and Graphics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1012-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2013.10.003. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Gordon Wetzstein, Douglas Lanman, Matthew Hirsch, Ramesh Raskar (2012-07). "Tensor displays: Compressive light field synthesis using multilayer displays with directional backlighting". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 31, no. 4 (SIGGRAPH 2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185576. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Masahiro Yamaguchi (2016-11-15). "Light-field and holographic three-dimensional displays [Invited"]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 33, no. 12, p. 2348. Optica Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.33.002348. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Pierre-Alexandre Blanche (2021). "Holography, and the future of 3D display". Light: Advanced Manufacturing, vol. 2, article 28, pp. 446-459. https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2021.028. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Sarah Zhang (2015-08-11). "The Obscure Neuroscience Problem That's Plaguing VR". Wired. https://www.wired.com/2015/08/obscure-neuroscience-problem-thats-plaguing-vr/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  8. ↑ Yao Zhou, Jufan Zhang, Fengzhou Fang (2021-12). "Vergence-accommodation conflict in optical see-through display: review and prospect". Results in Optics, vol. 5, article 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2021.100160. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  9. ↑ 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 Douglas Lanman, David Luebke (2013-11). "Near-eye light field displays". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 32, no. 6 (SIGGRAPH Asia 2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2508363.2508366. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 David M. Hoffman, Ahna R. Girshick, Kurt Akeley, Martin S. Banks (2008-03-28). "Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue". Journal of Vision, vol. 8, no. 3, article 33. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.3.33. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 CREAL. "Technology". CREAL. https://creal.com/technology/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  12. ↑ 12.00 12.01 12.02 12.03 12.04 12.05 12.06 12.07 12.08 12.09 12.10 Jianghao Xiong, En-Lin Hsiang, Ziqian He, Tao Zhan, Shin-Tson Wu (2021-10-25). "Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives". Light: Science and Applications, vol. 10, article 216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00658-8. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 Looking Glass Factory (2025-05-14). "How does the Looking Glass technology work?". Looking Glass Help Center. https://looking-glass.helpscoutdocs.com/article/231-how-does-the-looking-glass-technology-work. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 Jon Peddie (2020-10-21). "Will Sony re-invent S3D?". Jon Peddie Research. https://www.jonpeddie.com/blog/will-sony-re-invent-s3d/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 Avegant (2017-03-15). "Avegant Introduces Light Field Technology for Mixed Reality". PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/avegant-introduces-light-field-technology-for-mixed-reality-300423855.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 Edward H. Adelson, James R. Bergen (1991). "The Plenoptic Function and the Elements of Early Vision". Computational Models of Visual Processing (MIT Press). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2002.003.0004. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.7 17.8 Péter Tamás Kovács (2015-06-23). "Light-Field Displays: Technology and Representation of 3D visual information". JPEG Pleno Workshop, Warsaw. Holografika. https://jpeg.org/downloads/plenoworkshop/5-Kovac%20-%20Light-field%20Displays.pdf. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Marc Levoy, Pat Hanrahan (1996-08). "Light field rendering". Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 31-42. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/237170.237199. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 David Fattal, Zhen Peng, Tho Tran, Sonny Vo, Marco Fiorentino, Jim Brug, Raymond G. Beausoleil (2013-03). "A multi-directional backlight for a wide-angle, glasses-free three-dimensional display". Nature, vol. 495, pp. 348-351. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11972. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 Sony Electronics (2020-10-19). "Sony Electronics Debuts Spatial Reality Display". Computer Graphics World. https://www.cgw.com/Press-Center/News/2020/Sony-Electronics-Debuts-Spatial-Reality-Display.aspx. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  21. ↑ 21.00 21.01 21.02 21.03 21.04 21.05 21.06 21.07 21.08 21.09 21.10 21.11 21.12 Sean Hollister (2024-01-19). "Leia is building a 3D empire on the back of the worst phone we've ever reviewed". The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/24036574/leia-glasses-free-3d-ces-2024. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 Tommy Palladino (2020-12). "Looking Glass Responds to Sony's Holographic Display with Consumer-Friendly Looking Glass Portrait". Next Reality. https://next.reality.news/news/looking-glass-responds-sonys-holographic-display-with-consumer-friendly-looking-glass-portrait-0384073/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Andrew Jones, Ian McDowall, Hideshi Yamada, Mark Bolas, Paul Debevec (2007-07). "Rendering for an interactive 360 degree light field display". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 26, no. 3 (SIGGRAPH 2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1276377.1276427. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 Fu-Chung Huang, Kevin Chen, Gordon Wetzstein (2015-07). "The light field stereoscope: immersive computer graphics via factored near-eye light field displays with focus cues". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 34, no. 4 (SIGGRAPH 2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2766922. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 A. Gershun (translated by P. Moon and G. Timoshenko) (1939). "The Light Field". Journal of Mathematics and Physics, vol. 18, pp. 51-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/sapm193918151. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 G. Lippmann (1908). "Épreuves réversibles donnant la sensation du relief". Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 821-825. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphystap:019080070082100. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  27. ↑ Wojciech Matusik, Hanspeter Pfister (2004-08). "3D TV: a scalable system for real-time acquisition, transmission, and autostereoscopic display of dynamic scenes". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, no. 3 (SIGGRAPH 2004), pp. 814-824. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015706.1015805. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Bennett Wilburn, Neel Joshi, Vaibhav Vaish, Eino-Ville Talvala, Emilio Antunez, Adam Barth, Andrew Adams, Mark Horowitz, Marc Levoy (2005-07). "High performance imaging using large camera arrays". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 24, no. 3 (SIGGRAPH 2005), pp. 765-776. https://doi.org/10.1145/1073204.1073259. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 USC Institute for Creative Technologies Vision and Graphics Lab. "Rendering for an Interactive 360 Light Field Display". USC ICT. https://vgl.ict.usc.edu/Research/3DDisplay/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 Douglas Lanman, Matthew Hirsch, Yunhee Kim, Ramesh Raskar (2010-12). "Content-adaptive parallax barriers: optimizing dual-layer 3D displays using low-rank light field factorization". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 29, no. 6 (SIGGRAPH Asia 2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1882261.1866164. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 Andrew Maimone, Gordon Wetzstein, Matthew Hirsch, Douglas Lanman, Ramesh Raskar, Henry Fuchs (2013-09). "Focus 3D: compressive accommodation display". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 32, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2503144. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Douglas Lanman, David Luebke (2013-11). "Near-Eye Light Field Displays". NVIDIA Research. https://research.nvidia.com/publication/2013-11_near-eye-light-field-displays. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 Hong Hua, Bahram Javidi (2014-05-28). "A 3D integral imaging optical see-through head-mounted display". Optics Express, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 13484-13491. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.013484. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 Abner Li (2017-12-20). "Google-backed Magic Leap unveils its first augmented reality headset, shipping in 2018". 9to5Google. https://9to5google.com/2017/12/20/magic-leap-announcement/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3 John Wallace (2018-08-02). "JDI and NHK-MT create 17 inch light-field display that allows 3D video without glasses". Laser Focus World. https://www.laserfocusworld.com/detectors-imaging/article/16571266/jdi-and-nhk-mt-create-17-inch-light-field-display-that-allows-3d-video-without-glasses. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 Brian Heater (2020-01-07). "Looking Glass is targeting enterprises and eventually gamers with 8K holographic display". TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/07/looking-glass-is-targeting-enterprises-and-eventually-gamers-with-8k-holographic-display/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.3 37.4 37.5 Ben Lang (2021-01-11). "CREAL Reveals Its First Light-field AR and VR Headset Prototypes". Road to VR. https://www.roadtovr.com/creal-light-field-ar-vr-headset-prototype/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 38.2 Clay Bavor (2021-05-18). "Project Starline: Feel like you're there, together". The Keyword (Google blog). https://blog.google/technology/research/project-starline/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 "Light Field Lab Unveils SolidLight the Highest Resolution Holographic Display Platform Ever Designed". AVNation. 2021-10-08. https://www.avnation.tv/2021/10/08/light-field-lab-unveils-solidlight-the-highest-resolution-holographic-display-platform-ever-designed/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 40.4 40.5 40.6 40.7 40.8 Dean Takahashi (2023-02-08). "Light Field Lab raises $50M to manufacture its SolidLight holographic displays". GamesBeat. https://gamesbeat.com/light-field-lab-raises-50m-to-manufacture-its-solidlight-holographic-displays/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  41. ↑ 41.0 41.1 Martin Schwarz (2023-04-09). "New 27-inch display from Sony offers 3D without VR headset". MIXED. https://mixed-news.com/en/?p=14446. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 Looking Glass Factory (2025-04-29). "Spring Updates @ Looking Glass - March and April 2025". Looking Glass Blog. https://blog.lookingglassfactory.com/spring-updates-looking-glass-march-april-2025/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.4 43.5 43.6 Looking Glass Factory (2025-09-16). "Looking Glass Unveils a New Category of Display: The Hololuminescent Display". Looking Glass Blog. https://blog.lookingglassfactory.com/looking-glass-unveils-a-new-category-of-display-the-hololuminescent-display/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 Scott Hayden (2025-06-13). "Google's First 'Beam' Videoconferencing Device is 'HP Dimension', Coming Late 2025 at $25,000". Road to VR. https://www.roadtovr.com/hp-dimension-google-beam-price-release-date/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 Scott Hayden (2025-07-11). "CREAL Secures $8.9M Funding to Miniaturize Light Field Display for AR Glasses". Road to VR. https://www.roadtovr.com/creal-8-9-m-funding-light-field-display-ar-glasses/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  46. ↑ 46.0 46.1 46.2 Weijie Ma, Zhangrui Zhao, Canyu Zhao, Wanli Ouyang, Han-Sen Zhong (2025-11-26). "Glasses-free 3D display with ultrawide viewing range using deep learning". Nature, vol. 648, pp. 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09752-y. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 Fu-Chung Huang, Gordon Wetzstein, Brian A. Barsky, Ramesh Raskar (2014-07). "Eyeglasses-free display: towards correcting visual aberrations with computational light field displays". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 33, no. 4 (SIGGRAPH 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601122. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Sam Goldheart (2018-08-22). "The Science Behind the Magic Leap". iFixit. https://www.ifixit.com/News/magic-leap-teardown. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 Sheng Liu, Dewen Cheng, Hong Hua (2008-09). "An optical see-through head mounted display with addressable focal planes". 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2008), pp. 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637321. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Tomas Sluka (2019-09-26). "US20190293939A1: Near-eye sequential light-field projector with correct monocular depth cues". Google Patents. CREAL SA. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190293939A1/en. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  51. ↑ Andrew Maimone, Andreas Georgiou, Joel S. Kollin (2017-07). "Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 36, no. 4 (SIGGRAPH 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073624. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 52.2 Shuyao Zhou, Tianqian Zhu, Kanle Shi, Yazi Li, Wen Zheng, Junhai Yong (2021-12). "Review of light field technologies". Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, vol. 4, article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00096-8. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 Cristian Gnaticov (2020-03-17). "New Genesis GV80 Debuts Continental's 3D Digital Instrument Cluster". Carscoops. https://www.carscoops.com/2020/03/continentals-3d-digital-instrument-cluster-debuts-in-the-2021-genesis-gv80/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  54. ↑ 54.0 54.1 J. Lawrence, D. Goldman, S. Achar, G. Blascovich, J. Desloge, T. Fortes, E. Gomez, S. Haberling, H. Hoppe, A. Huibers, et al. (2021-12). "Project Starline: A high-fidelity telepresence system". ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 40, no. 6 (SIGGRAPH Asia 2021), article 242. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478513.3480490. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 55.4 Looking Glass Factory. "Software". Looking Glass Factory. https://lookingglassfactory.com/software. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  56. ↑ Sony. "Spatial Reality Display developer site". Sony XYN. https://xyn.sony.net/en/developer/spatial-reality-display. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  57. ↑ 57.0 57.1 57.2 Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Ren Ng (2020). "NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis". European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2020), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_24. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 58.2 58.3 Deborah Balshem (2026-04-24). "Leia could seek up to USD 100m this year for glasses-free 3D display tech - CEO". Mergermarket (ION Analytics). https://ionanalytics.com/insights/mergermarket/leia-could-seek-up-to-usd-100m-this-year-for-glasses-free-3d-display-tech-ceo/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  59. ↑ 59.0 59.1 JPEG. "JPEG Pleno". jpeg.org. https://jpeg.org/jpegpleno/index.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  60. ↑ Andrew Nartker (2023-05-10). "A first look at Project Starline's new, simpler prototype". The Keyword (Google blog). https://blog.google/technology/research/project-starline-prototype/. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  61. ↑ Xinhua (2025-12-04). "Chinese team uses AI to create wide-angle 3D display not requiring glasses". Shanghai Municipal People's Government. https://english.shanghai.gov.cn/en-Strength-Scitechcenter/20251204/33027ca5f523435aa07c3154b1896e66.html. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
  62. ↑ Guanjun Tan, Tao Zhan, Yun-Han Lee, Jianghao Xiong, Shin-Tson Wu (2019-03). "Near-eye light-field display with polarization multiplexing". Proceedings of SPIE 10942, Advances in Display Technologies IX. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2509121. Retrieved 2026-10-13.
Retrieved from "https://vrarwiki.com/index.php?title=Light_field_display&oldid=51754"