AR glasses: Difference between revisions
Xinreality (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Xinreality (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
*[[Social norm]] disruption and the [[digital divide]]. | *[[Social norm]] disruption and the [[digital divide]]. | ||
*Aesthetic and [[ergonomics|ergonomic]] issues impacting adoption. Bulky or conspicuous designs can lead to stigma. | *Aesthetic and [[ergonomics|ergonomic]] issues impacting adoption. Bulky or conspicuous designs can lead to stigma. | ||
*Technical artifacts like "[[eye glow]]" (light leakage from [[waveguide]]s) can be distracting or reveal device usage.<ref name=" | *Technical artifacts like "[[eye glow]]" (light leakage from [[waveguide]]s) can be distracting or reveal device usage.<ref name="EyeGlowReview"> | ||
Ding, Y.; Yang, Q.; Li, Y. <i>et al.</i> (2023). | |||
“Waveguide-based augmented reality displays: perspectives and challenges”. | |||
<i>eLight</i> 3 (24): 1–39. doi:10.1186/s43593-023-00057-z. | |||
Section 2.1 & 3.2.5 discuss the “eye-glow” artifact. | |||
Retrieved 30 April 2025. | |||
https://elight.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43593-023-00057-z | |||
</ref> | |||
Manufacturers are attempting to address these concerns through measures like visible recording indicators (LEDs), [[privacy by design]] principles, onboard processing to limit data transfer, and focusing on more conventional eyeglass [[form factor]]s. Public acceptance likely depends on demonstrating clear user benefits while mitigating privacy risks and social friction. | Manufacturers are attempting to address these concerns through measures like visible recording indicators (LEDs), [[privacy by design]] principles, onboard processing to limit data transfer, and focusing on more conventional eyeglass [[form factor]]s. Public acceptance likely depends on demonstrating clear user benefits while mitigating privacy risks and social friction. | ||