Jump to content

Virtual i-O i-glasses!: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 206: Line 206:
The i-glasses were positioned as an affordable alternative to high-end VR systems of the era. At $395-$799 depending on the model, they were significantly less expensive than professional VR equipment while offering consumer-friendly features like lightweight design and broad compatibility.<ref name="google-arts"/>
The i-glasses were positioned as an affordable alternative to high-end VR systems of the era. At $395-$799 depending on the model, they were significantly less expensive than professional VR equipment while offering consumer-friendly features like lightweight design and broad compatibility.<ref name="google-arts"/>


Early reviews praised the unit's 227-gram mass—half that of rival [[Forte VFX-1]]—and competitive entry price, yet criticized its narrow 30-degree field of view and visible pixels.<ref name="stereo3d">Stereo3D.com. SVGA i-Glasses Experience forum thread. March 16, 2003.</ref>
Early reviews praised the unit's 227-gram mass, half that of rival [[Forte VFX-1]], and competitive entry price, yet criticized its narrow 30-degree field of view and visible pixels.<ref name="stereo3d">Stereo3D.com. SVGA i-Glasses Experience forum thread. March 16, 2003.</ref>


===Commercial Performance===
===Commercial Performance===