Jump to content

Positional tracking: Difference between revisions

Acro (talk | contribs)
INcrease good
Acro (talk | contribs)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 45: Line 45:


In a controlled environment, magnetic tracking’s accuracy is good. However, it can be influenced by interference from conductive materials near the emitter of sensors, from other magnetic fields generated by other devices and from ferromagnetic materials in the tracking area.
In a controlled environment, magnetic tracking’s accuracy is good. However, it can be influenced by interference from conductive materials near the emitter of sensors, from other magnetic fields generated by other devices and from ferromagnetic materials in the tracking area.
The [[Razor Hydra]] motion controllers is an example of implementation of this specific type of positional tracking in a product.
The [[Razer Hydra]] motion controllers is an example of implementation of this specific type of positional tracking in a product.


Most [[Head-mounted display|Head-mounted displays]] (HMDs) and smartphones contain [[IMUs]] or [[magnetometer|magnetometers]] that detect the magnetic field of Earth.
Most [[Head-mounted display|Head-mounted displays]] (HMDs) and smartphones contain [[IMUs]] or [[magnetometer|magnetometers]] that detect the magnetic field of Earth.
Magnetic tracking can be AC or DC. Magnetic tracking is great because it doesn't need a Kalman filter. It is much higher quality than all other tracking methods, but there are constraints on its usage, like how it cannot be used in environments with a lot of metal due to interference.


===Optical Tracking===
===Optical Tracking===