Jump to content

Electromagnetic tracking: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[[Electromagnetic tracking]]''' ('''EMT''') is a [[Pose (computer vision)|pose]]-estimation technology widely used in [[Virtual reality|[[Virtual reality]]]] (VR), [[Augmented reality|[[augmented reality]]]] (AR), medical navigation, and human–[[robotics|robot–computer interaction]].   
[[Electromagnetic tracking]] ('''EMT''') is a [[Pose]]-estimation technology widely used in [[virtual reality]] (VR), [[augmented reality]] (AR), medical navigation, and human–[[robotics|robot–computer interaction]].   
Unlike camera-based [[Optical tracking|[[optical tracking]]]] or pure [[Inertial tracking|[[inertial tracking]]]], EMT determines the **six-degree-of-freedom** ({{small|[[Six degrees of freedom|6DOF]]}}) position and orientation of miniature sensor coils without requiring line-of-sight. A stationary **field generator** produces a precisely controlled magnetic field; tri-axial receiver coils measure that field, and the system solves for each sensor’s pose every frame. Because each frame is computed independently, EMT suffers **no cumulative drift**, while latencies are typically only a few milliseconds.<ref>Yaniv Z., Wilson E., Lindisch D., Cleary K. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” ''Medical Physics'' 36 (3): 876-892 (2009). doi:10.1118/1.3075829.</ref>
Unlike camera-based [[optical tracking]] or pure [[inertial tracking]], EMT determines the ''six-degree-of-freedom'' ([[6DOF]]) position and orientation of miniature sensor coils without requiring line-of-sight. A stationary [[field generator]] produces a precisely controlled magnetic field. Tri-axial receiver coils measure that field, and the system solves for each sensor’s pose every frame. Because each frame is computed independently, EMT suffers **no cumulative drift**, while latencies are typically only a few milliseconds.<ref>Yaniv Z., Wilson E., Lindisch D., Cleary K. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” ''Medical Physics'' 36 (3): 876-892 (2009). doi:10.1118/1.3075829.</ref>


==History==
==History==
Line 11: Line 11:


==Technical characteristics==
==Technical characteristics==
; Field generators 
===Field Generators===
Transmitters are supplied as planar plates, cube frames, or towers. A standard Polhemus FASTRAK source covers ≈1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.5 m at up to 120 Hz.<ref>Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.” PDF, 2020.</ref>
Transmitters are supplied as planar plates, cube frames, or towers. A standard Polhemus FASTRAK source covers ≈1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.5 m at up to 120 Hz.<ref>Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.” PDF, 2020.</ref>


; Sensors
===Sensors===
Modern sensors are extremely small: the Aurora 6DOF “micro” sensor is only 1.8 mm Ø, while its smallest 5DOF sensor is 0.3 mm Ø.<ref>Northern Digital Inc. “Aurora Electromagnetic Tracking – Sensors & Tools.” NDigital.com, accessed 30 April 2025.</ref> A single Aurora controller can track up to 32 5DOF or 16 6DOF sensors.
Modern sensors are extremely small: the Aurora 6DOF “micro” sensor is only 1.8 mm Ø, while its smallest 5DOF sensor is 0.3 mm Ø.<ref>Northern Digital Inc. “Aurora Electromagnetic Tracking – Sensors & Tools.” NDigital.com, accessed 30 April 2025.</ref> A single Aurora controller can track up to 32 5DOF or 16 6DOF sensors.


; Performance
===Performance===
Static laboratory accuracy for FASTRAK is ≈0.76 mm RMS and 0.15° RMS<ref>Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.”</ref>; update rates range 50–120 Hz; latency is 3–10 ms. Real-world performance degrades near conductive or ferromagnetic objects, high-current devices, or at distances >1 m, where the field drops rapidly.
Static laboratory accuracy for FASTRAK is ≈0.76 mm RMS and 0.15° RMS<ref>Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.”</ref>; update rates range 50–120 Hz; latency is 3–10 ms. Real-world performance degrades near conductive or ferromagnetic objects, high-current devices, or at distances >1 m, where the field drops rapidly.


; AC vs. pulsed-DC
===AC vs. Pulsed-DC===
AC trackers (Polhemus, NDI) supply strong continuous fields but are susceptible to eddy-current distortion. Pulsed-DC trackers (Ascension “Bird”) reduce such distortion at the cost of lower refresh rates.<ref>Ascension Technology Corp. “Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking Technology Overview.”</ref>
AC trackers (Polhemus, NDI) supply strong continuous fields but are susceptible to eddy-current distortion. Pulsed-DC trackers (Ascension “Bird”) reduce such distortion at the cost of lower refresh rates.<ref>Ascension Technology Corp. “Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking Technology Overview.”</ref>


==Comparison with other tracking modalities==
==Comparison with Other Tracking Modalities==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! Modality !! Key strengths !! Key limitations
! Modality !! Key strengths !! Key limitations