Apple Vision Pro: Difference between revisions
Xinreality (talk | contribs) |
Xinreality (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
The Apple Vision Pro received generally positive reviews from technology critics, who praised its display quality, innovative interface, and technical achievements, while criticizing its weight, battery life, and high price point. | The Apple Vision Pro received generally positive reviews from technology critics, who praised its display quality, innovative interface, and technical achievements, while criticizing its weight, battery life, and high price point. | ||
Reviewers consistently highlighted the headset's impressive display technology and intuitive eye and hand tracking interface. The passthrough quality was considered superior to competing products, though still not fully transparent as some of Apple's marketing suggested<ref name="wired"></ref>. The ability to extend Mac displays and position multiple virtual screens was praised as a compelling productivity use case<ref name="gq">Leedham, R. (2024). Apple's Vision Pro is its most thrilling first-gen product since the iPhone. GQ. https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/apple-vision-pro-review</ref>. | Reviewers consistently highlighted the headset's impressive display technology and intuitive [[eye tracking|eye]] and [[hand tracking]] interface. The [[passthrough]] quality was considered superior to competing products, though still not fully transparent as some of Apple's marketing suggested<ref name="wired"></ref>. The ability to extend Mac displays and position multiple virtual screens was praised as a compelling productivity use case<ref name="gq">Leedham, R. (2024). Apple's Vision Pro is its most thrilling first-gen product since the iPhone. GQ. https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/apple-vision-pro-review</ref>. | ||
Common criticisms included: | Common criticisms included: | ||